Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFurtado, Antonio L.spa
dc.contributor.authorM. Ciarlini, Angelo E.spa
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-27T00:21:28Z
dc.date.available2020-10-27T00:21:28Z
dc.date.issued2002-12-01
dc.identifier.issn2539-2115
dc.identifier.issn1657-2831
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/9059
dc.description.abstractSe presenta una propuesta hacia la extensión de modelos conceptuales de sistemas de información, en para permitir la especificación y simulación del comportamiento de los agentes con un grado adecuado de realismo. Nuestro método se basa principalmente en reglas para inferir los objetivos de los agentes a partir de situaciones que tienen en estados dados. En este artículo, argumentamos que las reglas deberían tener en cuenta tanto las funciones cognitivas como las características afectivas, como se puede transmitir, para los distintos agentes, por sus perfiles individuales y estados internos actuales. Tales características también deberían influir en la elección de estrategias para manejar las interferencias de objetivos en entornos de múltiples objetivos/multiagente.spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNAB
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/rcc/article/view/1099/1071
dc.relation.urihttps://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/rcc/article/view/1099
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2002 Revista Colombiana de Computación
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.sourceRevista Colombiana de Computación; Vol. 3 Núm. 2 (2002): Revista Colombiana de Computación; 1-13
dc.subjectInnovaciones tecnológicas
dc.subjectCiencia de los computadores
dc.subjectDesarrollo de tecnología
dc.subjectIngeniería de sistemas
dc.subjectInvestigaciones
dc.subjectTecnologías de la información y las comunicaciones
dc.subjectTIC´s
dc.titleMotivación cognitiva y afectiva en el modelado conceptualspa
dc.title.translatedCognitive and affective motivation in conceptual modellingeng
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.localArtículospa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.subject.keywordsTechnological innovationseng
dc.subject.keywordsComputer scienceeng
dc.subject.keywordsTechnology developmenteng
dc.subject.keywordsSystems engineeringeng
dc.subject.keywordsInvestigationseng
dc.subject.keywordsInformation and communication technologieseng
dc.subject.keywordsICT'seng
dc.subject.keywordsConceptual modellingeng
dc.subject.keywordsSimulationeng
dc.subject.keywordsMulti-agentseng
dc.subject.keywordsAffective motivationeng
dc.subject.keywordsGoal interferenceseng
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNABspa
dc.type.hasversionInfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.relation.referencesM. A. Alberti, D. Maggiorin, P. Trapani. NARTOO: a tool based on semiotics to support the manipulation of a narrative. In Proc. of Computational Semiotics for Games and New Media (COSIGN02). Augsburg , 2002.
dc.relation.referencesJ. Bates. The role of emotion in believable agents. Communications of the ACM, 7, 37 122-125, 1994.
dc.relation.referencesC. Breazeal. A motivational system for regulating human-robot interaction. In Proc. of the Fifteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Madison, 54-61, 1998.
dc.relation.referencesJ. Carroll. The deep structure of literary representations. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 159-173, 1999.
dc.relation.referencesA. E. M. Ciarlini and A. L. Furtado. Understanding and Simulating Narratives in the Context of Information Systems. In Proc. of the 21th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling, 2002.
dc.relation.referencesP. R. Cohen, H. J. Levesque. Intention is Choice with Commitment. Artificial Intelligence, 42 (2-3) 213-261, 1990.
dc.relation.referencesP. R. Cohen and C. R. Perrault. Elements of a plan-based theory of speech acts. In Readings in Natural Language Processing. B. J. Grosz, K. S. Jones and B. L. Webber (eds.). Morgan Kaufmann, 423-440, 1986.
dc.relation.referencesA. E. M. Ciarlini, P. A. S. Veloso and A. L. Furtado. A Formal Framework for Modelling at the Behavioural Level. In Proc. of the European-Japanese Conference on Information Modeling and Knowledge Bases, 67-81, 2000.
dc.relation.referencesM. Carlsson and J. Widen. Sicstus Prolog Users Manual, Release 3.0. Swedish Institute of Computer Science, 1995.
dc.relation.referencesG. Davenport, S. Agamanolis, B. Barry, B. Bradley and K. Brooks. Synergistic storyscapes and constructionist cinematic sharing. IBM System Journal, 39 (3-4) 456-469, 2000.
dc.relation.referencesG. Donato, M. S. Bartlett, J. C. Hager, P. Ekman and T. J. Sejnowski. Classifying facial actions. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 21 (10) 974-989, 1999.
dc.relation.referencesA. Dardenne, A. v. Lamsweerde and S. Fickas. Goal-directed requirements acquisition. Science of Computer Programming 20, 3-50, 1993.
dc.relation.referencesW. Durant - The Story of Philosophy. Simon and Schuster, 1961.
dc.relation.referencesC. Elliott: Using the Affective Reasoner to Support Social Simulations. In Proc. of the 13th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 194-201, 1993.
dc.relation.referencesA. L. Furtado and A. E. M. Ciarlini: Constructing libraries of typical plans. In Proc. of the 13th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE), Interlaken, 124-139, 2001.
dc.relation.referencesT. Finin, R. Fritzson, D. McKay and R. McEntire. KQML as an agent communication language. In Proc. of the Third International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management,1994.
dc.relation.referencesP. C. Kanelakis, G. M. Kuper and P. Z. Revesz. Constraint query languages. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 51, 26-52, 1995.
dc.relation.referencesS. Kaiser and T. Wehrle. Emotion research and AI: some theoretical and technical issues. Geneva Studies in Emotion and Communication, 8 (2), 1-16, 1994.
dc.relation.referencesH. J. Levesque and G. Lakemeyer. The logic of knowledge bases. MIT Press, 2000.
dc.relation.referencesG. Mantovani - Social context in HCL: a new framework for mental models, cooperation and communication. Cognitive Science, 20, 2, 237-269, 1996.
dc.relation.referencesJ. Mylopoulos, L. Chung and E. Yu. From object-oriented to goal-oriented requirements analysis. Communications of the ACM, 42 (1), 31-37, 1999.
dc.relation.referencesG. Morgan. Images of Organization: the Executive Edition. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 1998.
dc.relation.referencesA. Ortony, G. L. Clore and M. A. Foss. The referential structure of the affective lexicon. Cognitive Science,11 (3) 341-364, 1987.
dc.relation.referencesP. O'Rorke and A. Ortony. Explaining Emotions. Cognitive Science, 18 (2) 283-323, 1994.
dc.relation.referencesC. Pelachaud, N. I. Badler and M. Steedman. Generating facial expressions for speech. Cognitive Science, 20, 1-46, 1996.
dc.relation.referencesJ. J. Perez Alcazar, A. L. Furtado and A. E. M. Ciarlini. Cooperative interfaces based on plan recognition and generation. In Proc. XXVII Conferencia Latinoamericana de Informática (CLEI), Mérida, 2001.
dc.relation.referencesP. Persson, J. Laaksolahti and P. Lönnqvist. Proc. of Stereotyping characters: a way of triggering anthropomorphism? In Proc. Socially Intelligent Agents - The Human in the Loop - AAAI Fall Symposium, 2000.
dc.relation.referencesR. W. Picard, E. Vyzas and J. Healey. Toward machine emotional intelligence: analysis of affective physiological state. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 23 (10) 1175-1191, 2001.
dc.relation.referencesA. S. Rao and M. P. Georgeff. Modeling rational agents within a BDI-architecture. In Proc. of the International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, 473-484, 1991.
dc.relation.referencesD. Rousseau, B. Hayes-Roth. A social-psychological model for synthetic actors. Knowledge Systems Laboratory of the Department of Computer Science, Report KSL 97- 07, Stanford University,1997.
dc.relation.referencesE. Rich. User modeling via stereotypes. Cognitive Science 3, 329-354, 1979.
dc.relation.referencesS. Russell and P. Norvig. Artificial Intelligence - a Modern Approach. Prentice-Hall, 1995.
dc.relation.referencesN. M. Sgouros. Dynamic generation, management and resolution of interactive plots. Artificial Intelligence, 107, 29-62, 1999.
dc.relation.referencesSpecial issue on digital entertainment. Scientific American, 283 (5), November 2000.
dc.relation.referencesA. Sloman and B. Logan. Architectures and tools for human-like agents. Communications of the ACM, 42 (3) 71-77, 1999.
dc.relation.referencesA. Tversky and D. Kahneman. Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgement. Psychological Review, 90, 293-315, 1983.
dc.relation.referencesJ. D. Velásquez. Modeling emotions and other motivations in synthetic agents. In Proc. of the Fourteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Providence, 10-15, 1997
dc.relation.referencesR. Willensky. Planning and Understanding - a Computational Approach to Human Reasoning. Addison-Wesley, 1983.
dc.relation.referencesM. Wooldridge and N. R. Jennings. Intelligent agents: theory and practice. Knowledge Engineering Review 10 (2), 1995.
dc.relation.referencesM. Wooldridge. Reasoning about Rational Agents. MIT Press, 2000.
dc.contributor.googlescholarFurtado, Antonio L. [axkOp4QAAAAJ]spa
dc.contributor.googlescholarFurtado, Antonio L. [Antonio-Furtado-2]spa
dc.subject.lembInnovaciones tecnológicasspa
dc.subject.lembCiencias de la computaciónspa
dc.subject.lembDesarrollo tecnológicospa
dc.subject.lembIngeniería de sistemasspa
dc.subject.lembInvestigaciónspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.unab.edu.co
dc.description.abstractenglishA proposal is presented towards the extension of conceptual models of information systems, in order to allow specification and simulation of the behaviour of agents with an adequate degree of realism. Our method is mainly based on rules to infer the goals of agents from situations holding at given states. In this paper, we argue that the rules should take into account both cognitive and affective characteristics, as can be conveyed, for the various agents, by their individual profiles and current internal states. Such characteristics should also influence the choice of strategies to handle goal interferences in multi-goal/multi-agent environments.eng
dc.subject.proposalModelado conceptualspa
dc.subject.proposalSimulaciónspa
dc.subject.proposalMulti-agentesspa
dc.subject.proposalMotivación afectivaspa
dc.subject.proposalInterferencias de golspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/CJournalArticle
dc.rights.creativecommonsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia*


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia