Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Intubación orotraqueal por personal inexperto: laringoscopio asistido por prototipo de estilete óptico inalámbrico vs kingvision y laringoscopia convencional en modelos simulados de vía aérea

dc.contributor.advisorRangel Jaimes, German Williamspa
dc.contributor.advisorMeléndez Flórez, Héctor Juliospa
dc.contributor.authorChaverra Kornerup, Santiagospa
dc.coverage.spatialBucaramanga (Santander, Colombia)spa
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-04T22:56:51Z
dc.date.available2020-08-04T22:56:51Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/7149
dc.description.abstractEl manejo de la vía a área es un componente fundamental de la práctica diaria en anestesiología. La ASA define vía aérea difícil como la situación clínica en la cual un anestesiólogo entrenado experimenta dificultad con ventilación con mascara facial, dificultad para intubación traqueal o ambas. Con frecuencia el personal médico se enfrenta a situaciones en las cuales se requieren herramientas adicionales para optimizar el abordaje de determinada vía aérea. El presente trabajo es un estudio de evaluación de tecnologías y dispositivos médicos e industriales en el cual se compara el éxito de intubación traqueal con videolaringoscopio King visión, prototipo de videoestilete y laringoscopia directa con hoja macintosh en modelos simulados de vía aérea normal y vía aérea difícil en operadores no expertos. Los resultados demuestran un éxito de intubación comparable en términos de tiempo de intubación e intentos de intubación con los 3 dispositivos evaluados. Este trabajo sienta las bases en miras de una validación clínica futura del prototipo de videoestilete, un dispositivo costo efectivo y útil para el manejo de la vía aérea.spa
dc.description.tableofcontents1. INTRODUCCION………………………………………………………………………………………… 5 2. PLANTEAMIENTO DEL PROBLEMA……………………………………………………………… 6 3. PREGUNTA DE INVESTIGACION…………………………………………………………………. 7 4. HIPOTESIS INVESTIGATIVA……………………………………………………………………… 8 5. MARCO TEORICO Y ESTADO DEL ARTE………………………………………………………. 9 6. JUSTIFICACION…………………………………………………………………………………………… 17 7. OBJETIVOS 7.1. OBJETIVO GENERAL....................................................……………………. 19 7.2. OBJETIVO ESPECIFICO…………………………………………………………………. 19 8. METODOLOGIA 8.1. TIPO DE ESTUDIO………………………………………………………………………. 20 8.2 MATERIALES Y METODOS……………………………………………………………. 20 8.3 LUGAR DE REALIZACION……………………………………………………………. 20 8.4 TIEMPO DE EJECUCION………………………………………………………………… 20 8.5 POBLACION ELEGIBLE…………………………………………………………………… 20 8.6 CRITERIOS DE INCLUSION……………………………………………………………… 20 8.7 CRITERIOS DE EXCLUSION……………………………………………………………… 21 8.8 SELECCIÓN Y TAMAÑO DE LA MUESTRA……………………………………… 21 8.9 VARIABLES…………………………………………………………………………………… 21 8.10 ACTIVIDAD EN ESCENARIO SIMULADO…………………………………… 22 9. CONSIDERACIONES ETICAS…………………………………………….........………………… 23 10. RESULTADOS ……………………………………………………………………………………….. 24 11. BIBLIOGRAFIA……………………………………………………………………………………………. 27spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/*
dc.subject.meshIntubación intratraquealspa
dc.titleIntubación orotraqueal por personal inexperto: laringoscopio asistido por prototipo de estilete óptico inalámbrico vs kingvision y laringoscopia convencional en modelos simulados de vía aéreaspa
dc.title.translatedTracheal intubation by non expert personel: wireless videostylet asisted laryngoscopy vs kingvision and conventional laryngoscopy en simulated airway scenarioeng
dc.degree.nameEspecialista en Anestesiologíaspa
dc.publisher.grantorUniversidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNABspa
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad Ciencias de la Saludspa
dc.publisher.programEspecialización en Anestesiologíaspa
dc.description.degreelevelEspecializaciónspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.localTesisspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.subject.keywordsAnesthesiologyeng
dc.subject.keywordsMedical scienceseng
dc.subject.keywordsHealth scienceseng
dc.subject.keywordsMedicineeng
dc.subject.keywordsVideolaringoscopeeng
dc.subject.keywordsLaryngoscopeeng
dc.subject.keywordsAirway simulationeng
dc.subject.keywordsVideo styleteng
dc.subject.keywordsIntratracheal intubationeng
dc.subject.keywordsApparatus and instrumentseng
dc.subject.keywordsMedical supplieseng
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNABspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional UNABspa
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.relation.references1. Hagberg, Carin. Hagberg and Benumofs Airway Management, Fourth Edition. Elsevier, 2018.spa
dc.relation.references2. White, G.m.j. “Evolution Of Endotracheal And Endobronchial Intubation.” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 32, no. 5, 1960, pp. 235–246.spa
dc.relation.references3. Benoit, Justin L., Ryan B. Gerecht, Michael T. Steuerwald, and Jason T. Mcmullan. “Endotracheal Intubation versus Supraglottic Airway Placement in out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Meta-Analysis.” Resuscitation 93 (2015): 20–26.spa
dc.relation.references4. Hirsch, N. P., G. B. Smith, and P. O. Hirsch. “Alfred Kirstein.” Anaesthesia 41, no. 1 (1986): 42–45.spa
dc.relation.references5. Berkow, Lauren C., et al. “The Technology of Video Laryngoscopy.” Anesthesia & Analgesia, vol. 126, no. 5, 2018, pp. 1527–1534.spa
dc.relation.references6. Walls, Ron M., et al. Rosens Emergency Medicine: Concepts and Clinical Practice. Elsevier, 2018.spa
dc.relation.references7. Silverberg, Michael J., et al. “Comparison of Video Laryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy During Urgent Endotracheal Intubation.” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 43, no. 3, 2015, pp. 636–641.spa
dc.relation.references8. Kelly, F.e., and T.m. Cook. “Seeing Is Believing: Getting the Best out of Videolaryngoscopy.” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 117, 2016, pp. i9–i13.spa
dc.relation.references9. Frerk, C., et al. “Difficult Airway Society 2015 Guidelines for Management of Unanticipated Difficult Intubation in Adults.” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 115, no. 6, 2015, pp. 827–848.spa
dc.relation.references10. Apfelbaum, Jeffrey L., et al. “Practice Guidelines for Management of the Difficult Airway.” Anesthesiology, vol. 118, no. 2, 2013, pp. 251–270.spa
dc.relation.references11. Law, J. Adam, et al. “The Difficult Airway with Recommendations for Management – Part 1 – Difficult Tracheal Intubation Encountered in an Unconscious/Induced Patient.” Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal Canadien Danesthésie, vol. 60, no. 11, 2013, pp. 1089–1118.spa
dc.relation.references12. Cheney, Frederick W., Karen L. Posner, Lorri A. Lee, Robert A. Caplan, and Karen B. Domino. "Trends in Anesthesia-related Death and Brain Damage." Anesthesiology 105, no. 6 (2006): 1081-086.spa
dc.relation.references13. King Vision® Laryngoscope instruction manual. Disponible en: (http://www.ambucorp.com/blade/ifu/King-Vision-IFU-English-UK.pdf)spa
dc.relation.references14. Jarvis, Jeffrey L., et al. “EMS Intubation Improves with King Vision Video Laryngoscopy.” Prehospital Emergency Care, vol. 19, no. 4, 2015, pp. 482–489.spa
dc.relation.references15. Gaba, D M. “The Future Vision of Simulation in Health Care.” Quality and Safety in Health Care, vol. 13, no. suppl_1, 2004, pp. i2–i10.spa
dc.relation.references16. Berkenstadt, Haim, et al. “Incorporating Simulation-Based Objective Structured Clinical Examination into the Israeli National Board Examination in Anesthesiology.” Anesthesia & Analgesia, vol. 102, no. 3, 2006, pp. 853–858.spa
dc.relation.references17. Okuda, Yasuharu, et al. “The Utility of Simulation in Medical Education: What Is the Evidence?” Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine: A Journal of Translational and Personalized Medicine, vol. 76, no. 4, 2009, pp. 330–343.spa
dc.relation.references18. Yunoki, Kazuma, and Tetsuro Sakai. “The Role of Simulation Training in Anesthesiology Resident Education.” Journal of Anesthesia, vol. 32, no. 3, 2018, pp. 425–433.spa
dc.relation.references19. Kennedy, Cassie C., et al. “Advanced Airway Management Simulation Training in Medical Education.” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 42, no. 1, 2014, pp. 169–178.spa
dc.relation.references20. Mulcaster, Julian T., et al. “Laryngoscopic Intubation.” Anesthesiology, vol. 98, no. 1, 2003, pp. 23–27.spa
dc.relation.references21. Wamg, Henry E., et al. “Defining the Learning Curve for Paramedic Student Endotracheal Intubation.” Prehospital Emergency Care, vol. 9, no. 2, 2005, pp. 156–162.spa
dc.relation.references22. Especifiaciones del fabricante. Disponible en: (http://www.nidageo.com/products/164.html)spa
dc.relation.references23. Hagberg, C.A (2018) Current concepts in the management of the difficult airway. Anesthesiology news. Vol 15 No 2.spa
dc.relation.references24. Griesdale, Donald E. G., et al. “Glidescope® Video-Laryngoscopy versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal Canadien Danesthésie, vol. 59, no. 1, 2011, pp. 41–52.,spa
dc.relation.references25. Kaplan, Marshal B., et al. “Comparison of Direct and Video-Assisted Views of the Larynx during Routine Intubation.” Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, vol. 18, no. 5, 2006, pp. 357–362.spa
dc.relation.references26. Kovacs, George, et al. “A Comparison of a Fiberoptic Stylet and a Bougie as Adjuncts to Direct Laryngoscopy in a Manikin-Simulated Difficult Airway.” Annals of Emergency Medicine, vol. 50, no. 6, 2007, pp. 676–685.spa
dc.relation.references27. Pieters, B. M. A., et al. “Videolaryngoscopy vs. Direct Laryngoscopy Use by Experienced Anaesthetists in Patients with Known Difficult Airways: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Anaesthesia, vol. 72, no. 12, 2017, pp. 1532–1541.spa
dc.relation.references28. Aziz, Michael F., Dawn Dillman, Rongwei Fu, and Ansgar M. Brambrink. "Comparative Effectiveness of the C-MAC Video Laryngoscope versus Direct Laryngoscopy in the Setting of the Predicted Difficult Airway." Anesthesiology 116, no. 3 (2012): 629-36.spa
dc.relation.references29. Xue, Fu-Shan., et al. "Comparative Performance of Direct and Video Laryngoscopes in Patients with Predicted Difficult Airway." Anesthesiology Vol 117, no. 4, 2012, pp. 911-12.spa
dc.relation.references30. Ruetzler, K., et al. “Comparison of five video laryngoscopes and conventional direct laryngoscopy.” Der Anaesthesist, vol. 64, no. 7, 2015, pp. 513–519.spa
dc.relation.references31. Rendeki, Szilárd, et al. “Comparison of VividTrac®, Airtraq®, King Vision®, Macintosh Laryngoscope and a Custom-Made Videolaryngoscope for Difficult and Normal Airways in Mannequins by Novices.” BMC Anesthesiology, vol. 17, no. 1, 2017.spa
dc.relation.references32. Xue, Fu-Shan, et al. “Current Evidence for the Use of C-MAC Videolaryngoscope in Adult Airway Management: a Review of the Literature.” Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, Volume 13, 2017, pp. 831–841.spa
dc.relation.references33. Langeron, O., et al. “Difficult Intubation and Extubation in Adult Anaesthesia.” Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine, 2018.spa
dc.relation.references34. Shih, Chiao Yen, and Chia Ming Chang. “Experience of Airway Management Training Program for Low- and Middle-Income Countries.” Anesthesia & Analgesia, vol. 127, no. 4, 2018.spa
dc.relation.references35. Griesdale, Donald E. G., et al. “Glidescope® Video-Laryngoscopy versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal Canadien Danesthésie, vol. 59, no. 1, Jan. 2011, pp. 41–52.spa
dc.relation.references36. Amathieu, Roland, et al. “An Algorithm for Difficult Airway Management, Modified for Modern Optical Devices (Airtraq Laryngoscope; LMA CTrach™).” Survey of Anesthesiology, vol. 55, no. 6, 2011, pp. 310–311.spa
dc.relation.references37. Ander F., et al. Time-to-intubation in obese patients. A randomized study comparing direct laryngoscopy and videolaryngoscopy in experienced anesthetists. Minerva Anestesiol 2017; 83:906-13.spa
dc.relation.references38. Jepsen, Cecilie H., et al. “Tracheal Intubation with a Flexible Fibreoptic Scope or the McGrath Videolaryngoscope in Simulated Difficult Airway Scenarios.” European Journal of Anaesthesiology, vol. 31, no. 3, 2014, pp. 131–136.spa
dc.relation.references39. Hoshijima, Hiroshi, et al. “Videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh Laryngoscope for Tracheal Intubation in Adults with Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, vol. 44, 2018, pp. 69–75.spa
dc.relation.references40. Lewis, S.r., et al. “Videolaryngoscopy versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Adult Patients Requiring Tracheal Intubation: a Cochrane Systematic Review.” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 119, no. 3, 2017, pp. 369–383.spa
dc.relation.references41. Strauss, Robert A., and Roseanna Noordhoek. “Management of the Difficult Airway.” Atlas of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics, vol. 18, no. 1, 2010, pp. 11–28.spa
dc.relation.references42. Walls, Ron M., et al. Rosens Emergency Medicine: Concepts and Clinical Practice. Elsevier, 2018.spa
dc.relation.references43. Levitan, Richard M., et al. “The Complexities of Tracheal Intubation With Direct Laryngoscopy and Alternative Intubation Devices.” Annals of Emergency Medicine, vol. 57, no. 3, 2011, pp. 240–247.spa
dc.relation.references44. Konrad, Christoph, et al. “Learning Manual Skills in Anesthesiology.” Anesthesia & Analgesia, vol. 86, no. 3, 1998, pp. 635–639.spa
dc.relation.references45. Rosenstock, Charlotte V., Bente Thøgersen, Arash Afshari, Anne-Lise Christensen, Claus Eriksen, and Mona M. Gätke. "Awake Fiberoptic or Awake Laryngoscopic Tracheal Intubation in Patients With Anticipated Difficult Airway Management." Survey of Anesthesiology 57, no. 1 (2013): 46.spa
dc.relation.references46. Suppan, L., Tramèr, M., Niquille, M., Grosgurin, O., & Marti, C. (2016). Alternative intubation techniques vs Macintosh laryngoscopy in patients with cervical spine immobilization: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 116(1), 27-36.spa
dc.relation.references47. Levitan, R. M., Heitz, J. W., Sweeney, M., & Cooper, R. M. (2011). The Complexities of Tracheal Intubation With Direct Laryngoscopy and Alternative Intubation Devices. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 57(3), 240-247.spa
dc.relation.references48. Vanderbilt, A., Pastis, N. J., Mayglothling, & Franzen, D. (2014). A review of the literature: Direct and video laryngoscopy with simulation as educational intervention. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 15.spa
dc.relation.references49. Arulkumaran, N., et al. “Videolaryngoscopy versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Emergency Orotracheal Intubation Outside the Operating Room: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 120, no. 4, 2018, pp. 712–724.spa
dc.relation.references50. Maharaj, C. H., J. Costello, B. D. Higgins, B. H. Harte, and J. G. Laffey. “Retention of Tracheal Intubation Skills by Novice Personnel: a Comparison of the Airtraq and Macintosh Laryngoscopes.” Anaesthesia 62, no. 3 (2007): 272–78.spa
dc.contributor.cvlachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001425741*
dc.contributor.cvlachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0000320609*
dc.contributor.cvlachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0000129266*
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1791-8099*
dc.subject.lembAnestesiologíaspa
dc.subject.lembCiencias médicasspa
dc.subject.lembMedicinaspa
dc.subject.lembAparatos e instrumentosspa
dc.subject.lembSuministros médicosspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.unab.edu.cospa
dc.description.abstractenglishAirway management is fundamental in the daily clinical practice in anesthesiology. ASA defines difficult airway as the clinical situation in which a trained anesthesiologist has difficulty with facial mask ventilation, intubation or both. With certain frequency healthcare providers have to face situations in which additional elements are required to improve approach of certain airway. This paper is a technology and medical devices study in which intubation success is compared between King vision, video stylet prototype and macintosh laryngoscopy in simulated difficult and normal airway scenario in non-expert operators. The results show a similar intubation success in terms of intubation time and intubation attempts in both scenarios with the three devices evaluated. This study sets ground for future clinical validation of the wireless video stylet, a cost effective and useful airway management device.eng
dc.subject.proposalCiencias de la saludspa
dc.subject.proposalVideolaringoscopiospa
dc.subject.proposalKing visiónspa
dc.subject.proposalLaringoscopiospa
dc.subject.proposalSimulación en vía aéreaspa
dc.subject.proposalVídeo estiletespa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM
dc.rights.creativecommonsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia*
dc.coverage.campusUNAB Campus Bucaramangaspa
dc.description.learningmodalityModalidad Presencialspa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre:
2019_Tesis_Santiago_Chaverra_K ...
Tamaño:
1.105Mb
Formato:
PDF
Descripción:
Tesis
Ver/
Thumbnail
Nombre:
2019_Licencia_Santiago_Chaverr ...
Tamaño:
462.3Kb
Formato:
PDF
Descripción:
Licencia
Ver/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia