Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.advisorRosero Pahi, Mario Albertospa
dc.contributor.authorConde Angarita, Lina Margaritaspa
dc.contributor.authorPorras López, Paula Alejandraspa
dc.contributor.authorRey Landinez, Marly Lilianaspa
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-26T16:15:05Z
dc.date.available2020-06-26T16:15:05Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/359
dc.description.abstractInvestigaciones previas han determinado que los Tiempos de Reacción (TR) correspondientes a diferentes tareas neurocognitivas se distribuyen como una función exgaussiana, es decir una combinación entre una función exponencial y una normal. Estudios recientes muestran que los parámetros μ y σ de la distribución corresponden a los procesos perceptuales y motores, mientras que el parámetro τ corresponde al proceso de toma de decisiones involucrado en dichas tareas. El presente estudio tiene como fin determinar si existen cambios significativos asociados a la edad (adultos jóvenes vs adultos) en alguno de los parámetros μ, τ y σ obtenidos de los TR correspondientes a una tarea de aprendizaje contextual ajustados a una distribución exgaussiana. Para ello se utilizó una tarea de aprendizaje contextual denominada “Contextual Cueing Task”; los TR de la tarea se ajustaron a la distribución exgaussiana usando la toolbox DISTRIB en Matlab, obteniéndose los tres parámetros correspondientes a dicha función μ, σ, τ. Esta tarea fue aplicada a 20 participantes (8 mujeres) con edades entre 19 a 43 años, con quienes se conformaron dos grupos de estudio; el primero Adultos jóvenes (n=10) con edades entre 19 a 26 años, y el segundo Adultos (n=10) con participantes de 27 a 43 años. Los resultados mostraron la edad y el contexto no ejerce un efecto significativo sobre los parámetros μ, σ, τ de la función exgaussiana.spa
dc.description.tableofcontentsResumen .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Introducción .................................................................................................................................... 2 Planteamiento del problema ............................................................................................................ 4 Formulación de la pregunta ............................................................................................................ 5 Planteamiento de hipótesis .............................................................................................................. 5 Justificación de la investigación ..................................................................................................... 6 Objetivos ......................................................................................................................................... 7 Objetivo general .......................................................................................................................... 7 Objetivos específicos................................................................................................................... 7 Antecedentes de investigación ........................................................................................................ 8 Marco teórico ................................................................................................................................ 12 Distribuciones de Tiempo de Reacción (TR) y procesos involucrados .................................... 13 Función Exgaussiana ................................................................................................................. 16 Operalización de variables ............................................................................................................ 19 Método .......................................................................................................................................... 20 Tipo de investigación ................................................................................................................ 20 Diseño........................................................................................................................................ 20 Sujetos ....................................................................................................................................... 20 Criterios de inclusión. ............................................................................................................ 21 Criterios de exclusión. ........................................................................................................... 21 Instrumentos .............................................................................................................................. 21 Contextual Cueing Task (Chun y Jiang, 1998). .................................................................... 21 Procedimiento............................................................................................................................ 23 Ajuste de TR a la función exgaussiana. ................................................................................ 24 Resultados ..................................................................................................................................... 26 Discusión....................................................................................................................................... 28 Conclusiones ................................................................................................................................. 30 Referencias .................................................................................................................................... 31 Apéndices ...................................................................................................................................... 35 Consentimiento informado ........................................................................................................ 35spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/*
dc.titleEfecto de la edad sobre los parámetros µ, T y σ obtenidas del ajuste de tiempos de reacción de una tarea de aprendizaje contextual implícito a una función exgaussianaspa
dc.title.translatedEffect of age on parameters µ, T and σ obtained from adjusting reaction times of an implicit contextual learning task to an ex-Gaussian functioneng
dc.degree.namePsicólogospa
dc.coverageBucaramanga (Colombia)spa
dc.publisher.grantorUniversidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNABspa
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad Ciencias de la Saludspa
dc.publisher.programPregrado Psicologíaspa
dc.description.degreelevelPregradospa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
dc.type.localTrabajo de Gradospa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.subject.keywordsCognitive psychologyeng
dc.subject.keywordsDecision makingeng
dc.subject.keywordsMemoryeng
dc.subject.keywordsGauss distributioneng
dc.subject.keywordsPsychologyeng
dc.subject.keywordsResearcheng
dc.subject.keywordsContexteng
dc.subject.keywordsAgeeng
dc.subject.keywordsReaction timeseng
dc.subject.keywordsParameters μ σ τeng
dc.subject.keywordsEx-gaussian distributioneng
dc.subject.keywordsImplicit contextual learningeng
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNABspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional UNABspa
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.relation.referencesConde Angarita, Lina Margarita, Porras López, Paula Alejandra, Rey Landinez, Marly Liliana (2017). Efecto de la edad sobre los parámetros µ, T y ? obtenidas del ajuste de tiempos de reacción de una tarea de aprendizaje contextual implícito a una función exgaussiana. Bucaramanga (Colombia) : Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNABspa
dc.relation.referencesBaayen, H., & Milin, P. (2010). Analyzing Reaction Times. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(2), 12-28. doi:10.21500/20112084.807spa
dc.relation.referencesBaayen, H., & Milin, P. (2010). Analyzing Reaction Times. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(2), 12-28. doi:10.21500/20112084.807spa
dc.relation.referencesBurin, D. I., & Duarte, A. D. (2005). Efectos del envejecimiento en el ejecutivo central de la memoria de trabajo. Revista Argentina de Neuropsicología, 6, 1-11. Extraído de http://revneuropsi.sonepsa.com.ar/pdf/Burin_y_Duarte_vf.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesChun, M. M. (2000). Contextual cueing of visual attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(5), 170-177. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01476-5spa
dc.relation.referencesChun, M. M., & Phelps, E. A. (1999). Memory deficits for implicit contextual information in amnesic subjects with hippocampal damage. Nature neurosciencie, 2(9), 844-847. doi:10.1038/12222spa
dc.relation.referencesCraik, F., & Jennings, J. (1992). Human memory (Salthouse TA, Ed.). In The handbook of ageing and cognition (pp. 51-110). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Incspa
dc.relation.referencesEichenbaum, H., Sauvage, M., Fortin, N., Komorowski, R., & Lipton, P. (2012). Towards a functional organization of episodic memory in the medial temporal lobe. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(7), 1597-1608. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.07.00spa
dc.relation.referencesFernández, C., Hernández, R. & Baptista, P. (2014). Metodología de la Investigación (5ta ed.). México D.F.: MCGRAW-HILL. ISBN: 978-607-15-0291-9spa
dc.relation.referencesGraf, P., & Schacter, D. (1985). Implicit and Explicit Memory for New Associations in Normal and Amnesic Subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 11(3), 501-518. Retrieved from http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/schacterlab/files/grafschacter1985.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesHacker, M. J. (1980). Speed and accuracy of recency judgments for events in short‐term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 6, 651-675. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.6.6.651spa
dc.relation.referencesHayhoe, M. M., Besinger, D. G., & Ballard, D. H. (1998). Task constraints in visual working memory. Vision research, 38(1), 125-137. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S00426989(97)00116-8spa
dc.relation.referencesHeathcote, A., Popiel, S.J., Mewhort, D.J.K. (1991). Analysis of Response Time Distributions: An Example Using the Stroop Task. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 340-347. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.340spa
dc.relation.referencesHenderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (2003). Eye movements and visual memory: Detecting changes to saccade targets in scenes. Perception & Psychophysics, 65(1), 58-71. Retrieved from http://jhenderson.org/vclab/PDF_Pubs/Henderson_Hollingworth_PP_2003.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesHervey, A. S., Epstein, J. N., Curry, J. F., Tonev, S., Arnold, L. E., Conners, C. K., Hechtman, L. (2006). Reaction Time Distribution Analysis of Neuropsychological Performance in an ADHD Sample. Child Neuropsychology, 12(2), 125-140. doi:10.1080/09297040500499081spa
dc.relation.referencesHockley, W. E. (1984). Analysis of Response Time Distributions in the Study of Cognitive Processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 10(4), 598-615. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.10.4.598spa
dc.relation.referencesLacouture, Y., & Cousineau, D. (2008). How to use MATLAB to fit the ex‐Gaussian and other probability functions to a distribution of response times. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4(1), 35-45. doi:10.20982/tqmp.04.1.p035spa
dc.relation.referencesLezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., Bigler, E. D., & Tranel, D. (2012). Neuropsychological Assessment (5th ed.). New York, New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0-19539552-5spa
dc.relation.referencesLight, L. L. (1991). Memory and aging: Four hypotheses in search of data. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 333-376. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.42.020191.002001spa
dc.relation.referencesMadden, D., Gottlob, L., Denny, L., Turkington, T., Provenzale, J., Hawk, T., Coleman E. (1999). Aging and Recognition Memory: Changes in Regional Cerebral Blood Flow Associated with Components of Reaction Time Distributions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(5), 511–520. doi:10.1162/089892999563571spa
dc.relation.referencesManns, J. R., & Squire, L. R. (2001). Perceptual learning, awareness, and the hippocampus. Hippocampus, 11(6), 776-782. doi:10.1002/hipo.1093spa
dc.relation.referencesMewhort, D. J., Braun, J. G., & Heathcote, A. (1992). Response time distributions and the Stroop Task: a test of the Cohen, Dunbar, and McClelland (1990) model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance, 18(3), 872-882. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.18.3.872spa
dc.relation.referencesMilner, B. (1972). Disorders of learning and memory after temporal lobe lesions in man. Clinical Neurosurgery, 19, 421-446.spa
dc.relation.referencesMiyake, A., & Shah, P. (1999). Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control. New York, NY: CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESSspa
dc.relation.referencesO'Reilly, R. C., & Rudy, J. W. (2001). Conjunctive representations in learning and memory: Principles of cortical and hippocampal function. Psychological Review, 108(2), 311-345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.311spa
dc.relation.referencesPark, H., Quinlan, J., Thornton, E., & Reder, L. M. (2004). The effect of midazolam on visual search: Implications for understanding amnesia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(51), 17879-17883. doi:10.1073/pnas.0408075101spa
dc.relation.referencesRatcliff, R. (1979). Group Reaction Time Distributions and an Analysis of Distribution Statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 446-461. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.446spa
dc.relation.referencesRatcliff, R., & Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1976). Retrieval Processes in Recognition Memory. Psychological Review, 83(3), 190-214. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.83.3.190spa
dc.relation.referencesReber, P. J. (2008). Cognitive Neuroscience of Declarative and Nondeclarative Memory. Advances in Psychology, 139(C), 113-123. doi: 10.1016/S01664115(08)10010-3spa
dc.relation.referencesRudy, J. W., Huff, N. C., & Matus-Amat, P. (2004). Understanding contextual fear conditioning: insights from a two-process model. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 28 (7), 675-685. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.09.004spa
dc.relation.referencesRyan, J. D., Althoff, R. R., Withlow, S., & Cohen, N. J. (2000). Amnesia is a deficit in relational memory. Psychological Science, 11(6), 454-461. doi:10.1111/14679280.00288spa
dc.relation.referencesSmith, A. D. (1996). Memory. In Handbook of the psychology of aging (4th ed., pp. 236-250). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesSpieler, D. H., Balota, D. A., & Faust, M. E. (1996). Stroop performance in healthy younger and older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer's type. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance, 22(2), 461-479. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.22.2.461spa
dc.relation.referencesSpieler, D. H., Balota, D. A., & Faust, M. E. (1996). Stroop performance in healthy younger and older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer's type. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance, 22(2), 461-479. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.22.2.461spa
dc.relation.referencesSquire, L. R. (1992). Declarative and Nondeclarative Memory: Multiple Brain Systems Supporting Learning and Memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4(3), 231-243. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1992.4.3.232spa
dc.relation.referencesSquire, L. R. (2004). Memory systems of the brain: A brief history and current perspective. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 82, 171-177. doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2004.06.005spa
dc.relation.referencesSternberg, S. (2010, March 20). Reaction-Time Experimentation. Lecture presented at Proseminar in Psychological Methodsspa
dc.relation.referencesTakashima, A., Petersson, K., Rutters, F., Tendolkar, I., Jensen, O., Zwarts, M. J., Fernández, G. (2006). Declarative memory consolidation in humans: a prospective functional magnetic resonance imaging study. The National Academy of Sciences of U.S.A., 103(3), 756-761. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1334654/.spa
dc.relation.referencesTulving, E. (1983). Elements of Episodic Memory. London: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780198521259spa
dc.contributor.cvlacRosero Pahi, Mario Alberto [0001356760]*
dc.contributor.googlescholarRosero Pahi, Mario Alberto [lmqwzwUAAAAJ&hl=es]*
dc.contributor.orcidRosero Pahi, Mario Alberto [0000-0002-9546-4064]*
dc.contributor.researchgateRosero Pahi, Mario Alberto [Mario-Alberto-Rosero-Pahi]*
dc.subject.lembPsicología cognitivaspa
dc.subject.lembToma de decisionesspa
dc.subject.lembMemoriaspa
dc.subject.lembDistribución de Gaussspa
dc.subject.lembPsicologíaspa
dc.subject.lembInvestigacionesspa
dc.description.abstractenglishPrevious research has determined that the corresponding Reaction Times (TR) to different neurocognitive tasks are distributed as an ex-Gaussian function, that is, a combination between an exponential and a normal function. Recent studies show that parameters μ and σ of the distribution correspond to the perceptual and motor processes, while that the parameter τ corresponds to the decision-making process involved in these tasks. The purpose of this study is to determine if there are significant changes associated with the age (young adults vs adults) in any of the parameters μ, τ and σ obtained from the TR corresponding to a contextual learning task adjusted to an ex-Gaussian distribution. For this, a contextual learning task called “Contextual Cueing Task” was used; The TRs of the task were fitted to the ex-Gaussian distribution using the DISTRIB toolbox in Matlab, obtaining the three parameters corresponding to said function μ, σ, τ. This task was applied to 20 participants (8 women) aged between 19 to 43 years, with whom they formed two study groups; the first Young adults (n = 10) aged 19 to 26 years, and the second Adults (n = 10) with participants aged 27 to 43 years. The results showed the age and context do not have a significant effect on the parameters μ, σ, τ of the function ex-Gaussian.eng
dc.subject.proposalContextospa
dc.subject.proposalEdadspa
dc.subject.proposalTiempos de reacciónspa
dc.subject.proposalparámetros μ σ τspa
dc.subject.proposalDistribución exgaussianaspa
dc.subject.proposalAprendizaje contextual implícitospa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TP
dc.rights.creativecommonsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia*
dc.contributor.researchgroupGrupo de Investigación en Violencia, Lenguaje y Estudios Culturalesspa
dc.coverage.campusUNAB Campus Bucaramangaspa
dc.description.learningmodalityModalidad Presencialspa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia