Agentes inteligentes y dinámica de sistemas: consideraciones para su integración en el modelado y la simulación en informática educativa

Orellana Hernández, Martha Lucía

dc.contributor.advisor	Sotaquirá Gutierrez, Ricardo	spa
dc.contributor.author	Orellana Hernández, Martha Lucía	spa
dc.date.accessioned	2020-06-26T21:32:18Z
dc.date.available	2020-06-26T21:32:18Z
dc.date.issued	2007
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/3322
dc.description.abstract	El entendimiento de los sistemas complejos, incluyendo tanto su estructura como su comportamiento en el tiempo, es necesario para abordar apropiadamente la solución de problemas del mundo real, caracterizado por su creciente nivel de complejidad. Ante esta necesidad, los ambientes de aprendizaje interactivos, o micromundos basados en el computador, se presentan como una herramienta de apoyo que, utilizando modelos y simulaciones, permita el ejercicio de nuestros modelos mentales y el mejoramiento de la toma de decisiones ante la naturaleza compleja y en ocasiones contra-intuitiva de estos sistemas. Mientras la comunidad en SD ya ha venido trabajando en estos ambientes de aprendizaje, la incursión de AB en el campo del modelado y la simulación es más reciente y lo son también sus trabajos en el campo del aprendizaje. Este trabajo pretende explorar el aporte que podría tener la integración de los dos paradigmas, SD y AB, en un ambiente de aprendizaje interactivo, utilizando como caso de estudio un micromundo orientado al entendimiento de los sistemas complejos.	spa
dc.description.tableofcontents	INTRODUCCIÓN 1. MARCO TEÓRICO 1.1 MODELADO Y SIMULACIÓN 1.1.1 Modelos 1.1.2 Simulaciones 1.1.3 Sistemas Complejos 1.1.4 Pensamiento Sistémico 1.2 DOS PARADIGMAS DE MODELADO 1.2.1 Dinámica de Sistemas (System Dynamics: SD) 1.2.2 Basado en Agentes (Agent Based: AB) 1.3 AMBIENTES DE APRENDIZAJE INTERACTIVOS 1.3.1 Teorías del aprendizaje 1.3.2 Micromundos 2. ESTADO DEL ARTE 2.1 SD VERSUS AB 2.1.1 Estudios conjuntos de SD y AB 2.1.2 Resumen de características de los dos paradigmas 2.1.3 Herramientas software 2.2 AB, SD, Y EL APRENDIZAJE 2.2.1 Elementos de un ambiente de aprendizaje interactivo 2.2.2 SD y el aprendizaje 2.2.3 AB y el aprendizaje 3. REDISEÑO DE UN MICROMUNDO APLICANDO LA INTEGRACIÓN DE LOS DOS PARADIGMAS: SD Y AB 3.1 CONSIDERACIONES 3.2 HIPÓTESIS 3.3 CASO DE ESTUDIO 3.4 MODELADO Y SIMULACIÓN 3.5 MICROMUNDO 3.6 VALIDACIÓN 4. ANÁLISIS DE RESULTADOS 5. CONCLUSIONES 6. TRABAJOS FUTUROS Y RECOMENDACIONES BIBLIOGRAFÍA ANEXOS	spa
dc.format.mimetype	application/pdf	spa
dc.language.iso	spa	spa
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/	*
dc.title	Agentes inteligentes y dinámica de sistemas: consideraciones para su integración en el modelado y la simulación en informática educativa	spa
dc.title.translated	Intelligent agents and system dynamics: Considerations for their integration in computer modeling and simulation in educational Informatics	eng
dc.degree.name	Magíster en Ciencias Computacionales	spa
dc.coverage	Bucaramanga (Colombia)	spa
dc.publisher.grantor	Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNAB	spa
dc.rights.local	Abierto (Texto Completo)	spa
dc.publisher.faculty	Facultad Ingeniería	spa
dc.publisher.program	Maestría en Ciencias Computacionales	spa
dc.description.degreelevel	Maestría	spa
dc.type.driver	info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.local	Tesis	spa
dc.type.coar	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.subject.keywords	Computer simulation	eng
dc.subject.keywords	Smart agents	eng
dc.subject.keywords	Computer program	eng
dc.subject.keywords	Systems analysis	eng
dc.subject.keywords	Systems engineering	eng
dc.subject.keywords	Computational science	eng
dc.subject.keywords	Investigations	eng
dc.subject.keywords	Analysis	eng
dc.subject.keywords	Educational technology	eng
dc.subject.keywords	System dynamics	eng
dc.subject.keywords	Modeling and simulation based on agents	eng
dc.subject.keywords	Educational informatics	eng
dc.subject.keywords	Microworlds	eng
dc.identifier.instname	instname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNAB	spa
dc.identifier.reponame	reponame:Repositorio Institucional UNAB	spa
dc.type.hasversion	info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.rights.accessrights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess	spa
dc.rights.accessrights	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2	spa
dc.relation.references	Orellana Hernández, Martha Lucía, Sotaquirá, Ricardo (2007). Agentes inteligentes y dinámica de sistemas. Bucaramanga (Colombia) : Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNAB	spa
dc.relation.references	Aldrich, C. (2003). Six Criteria of an Educational Simulation. Learning Circuits.	spa
dc.relation.references	Bonabeau, E. (2002 a). Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99 Suppl 3: 7280-7287.	spa
dc.relation.references	Bonabeau, E. (2002 b). Predicting the Unpredictable. Harvard Business Review, Marzo.	spa
dc.relation.references	Bousquet, F., Barreteau, O., D’Aquino, P., Etienne, M., Boissau, S., Aubert, S., Le Page, C., Babin, D., & Castella, J.C. (2002) Multi-agent Systems and Role Games : Collective Learning Processes for Ecosystem Management. In M. Janssen, editor. Complexity and ecosystem management: The theory and practice of multi-agent approaches. Edward Elgar Publishers	spa
dc.relation.references	Borshchev, A & Filippov, A. (2004). From System Dynamics and Discrete Event to Practical Agent Based Modeling: Rehaznos, Techniques, Tools. Presented at the 2004 International Conference of the System Dynamics Society. July 25 – 29, Keble College, Oxford, England.	spa
dc.relation.references	Center for the Study of Complex Systems, CSCS. University of Michigan. Consulta realizada en Noviembre de 2006: http://www.cscs.umich.edu/	spa
dc.relation.references	Center for the Study of Institutions, Population, and Environmental Change, CIPEC, at Indiana University. (2002). Meeting the Challenge of Complexity. Proceedings of a Special Workshop on Land-Use/Land-Cover Change, Irvine, California.	spa
dc.relation.references	Center on Social and Economic Dynamics, CSED. The Road to Agent-based Models. The Brookings Institution. Massachusetts. Consulta realizada en Noviembre de 2006: http://www.brookings.edu/es/dynamics/models/history.htm	spa
dc.relation.references	Craig, S.D., Gholson, B., & Driscoll D. M. (2002). Animated Pedagogical Agents in Multimedia Educational Environments: Effects of Agent Properties, Picture Features, and Redundancy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94 (2), 428–434.	spa
dc.relation.references	Davidsen, P., Spector, J. M., & Milrad, M. (1999). Learning in and about Simple Dynamic Systems. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, in Wellington, New Zealand	spa
dc.relation.references	Doran, J. (2000). Hard Problems in the use of Agent Based Modelling. University of Essex. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Logic and Methodology. Cologne.	spa
dc.relation.references	Epstein , J. M. & Axtell, R. L. (1996). Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science From the Bottom Up. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press MIT Press.	spa
dc.relation.references	Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial Dynamics. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT Press.	spa
dc.relation.references	Galarneau, L. (2005). Authentic Learning Experiences Through Play: Games, Simulations and the Construction of Knowledge. The University of Waikato. Proceedings of DiGRA (Digital Games Research Association). Conference: Changing Views – Worlds in Play	spa
dc.relation.references	Galvis P., A. H. (1992). Ingeniería de Software Educativo. Santafé de Bogotá : Ediciones UniAndes.	spa
dc.relation.references	Gilbert, N. & Bankes, S. (2002). Platforms and methods for agent-based modeling [Abstract]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99, Suppl 3: 7197-7198	spa
dc.relation.references	Gilbert, N. & Troitzsch, K. (2005). Simulation for the Social Scientist (2a ed.). Milton Keynes: Open University Press	spa
dc.relation.references	Gilbert, N., den Besten, M., Bontovics, A., Craenen, B.G.W., Divina, F., Eiben, A.E., et al. (2006). Emerging Artificial Societies Through Learning. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 9(2).	spa
dc.relation.references	Gilbert, N., den Besten, M., Bontovics, A., Craenen, B.G.W., Divina, F., Eiben, A.E., et al. (2006). Emerging Artificial Societies Through Learning. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 9(2).	spa
dc.relation.references	Grossler, A., Stotz, M. & Schieritz, N. (2003). A Software Interface Between System Dynamics and Agent-Based Simulations. Presented at the 2003 System Dynamics Conference, New York City	spa
dc.relation.references	Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (1995). Critical characteristics of situated learning: Implications for the instructional design of multimedia. In J. Pearce & A. Ellis (Eds.) Learning with technology, ASCILITE’95 Conference Proceedings, (pp. 235-262). Melbourne: ASCILITE	spa
dc.relation.references	Jager, W. (2000). Modelling consumer behaviour. Doctoral thesis. Groningen: University of Groningen, Centre for Environmental and Traffic psychology	spa
dc.relation.references	Jennings, N. R., Sycara, K., Wooldridge, M. (1998). A Roadmap of Agent Research and Development. Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, 1(1), 7-38	spa
dc.relation.references	Jennings, N. R. (2000). On agent-based software engineering. Artificial Intelligence, 117(2), 277-296.	spa
dc.relation.references	Jonassen, D.H. (1992). Hypertext as Cognitive Tools. In Kommes P.A.M, Jonassen, D.H. & Mayes, J.T. (Eds), Cognitive Tools for Learning: Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute, 147-148.	spa
dc.relation.references	Jonassen, D.H., Carr, Ch. & Yueh, H. (1998). Computers as Mindtools for Engaging Learners in Critical Thinking. TechTrends, 43(2), 24-32	spa
dc.relation.references	Julián, V., Botti, V. (2003). Estudio de Métodos de Desarrollo de Sistemas Multiagente. Revista Iberoamericana de Inteligencia Artificial, 18, 65-80.	spa
dc.relation.references	Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1999). Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 351–371	spa
dc.relation.references	Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in Practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.	spa
dc.relation.references	Leelawong, K., Viswanath, K., Davis, J., Biswas, G., Vye, N., & Belynne, K. (2003). Teachable Agents: Learning by Teaching Environments for Science Domains. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI), Acapulco, Mexico, 109-116	spa
dc.relation.references	Lorenz, T. M. & Bassi, A. M. (2005). Comprehensibility as a discrimination criterion for agent-based modelling and System Dynamics: an empirical approach. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference of the System Dynamics Society July 17-21, Boston.	spa
dc.relation.references	Maier, F. H. & Grossler, A. (2000) What are we talking about? A taxonomy of computer smulations to support learning. System Dynamics Review, 16 (2), 135 – 14	spa
dc.relation.references	Martin, M., Piquet, E., Le Page, C., Guerrin, F. (2001). Magmas : A multi-agents system based on dynamical models coupling ; application to animal wastes management. In : Simulation in industry. 13th European Simulation Symposium, October 18-20, Marseille, France	spa
dc.relation.references	Mitchell, M. (2006). Complex Systems: Network Thinking. Portland State University and Santa Fe Institute. Enviado para publicación.	spa
dc.relation.references	Moreno, R., Mayer, R., Spires, H., & Lester, J. (2002). The Case for Social Agency in Computer-Based Teaching: ¿Do Students Learn More Deeply When They Interact With Animated Pedagogical Agents? Cognition and instruction, 19(2), 177-213.	spa
dc.relation.references	Novak, J. D. & Cañas, A.J. (2006). The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct Them. Technical Report IHMC CmapTools, Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition	spa
dc.relation.references	Odell, J. (2002). Agents and Complex Systems. Journal of Object Technology, 1(2), JulyAugust, 35-45	spa
dc.relation.references	Parunak, H.V.D., Savit, R. & Riolo, R. L.. (1998). Agent-.Based Modeling vs. EquationBased Modeling: A Case Study and Users’s Guide. In Sichman, J.S., Conte, R., and Gilbert, N. (Eds.), Multi-Agent Systems and Agent-Based Simulation, Springer Verla	spa
dc.relation.references	Pérez P., A. L. , Hoyos, S., Moreno, G. & Díaz, I. (2004). Integración de Técnicas de Inteligencia Artificial y Dinámica de Sistemas: Un Caso de Aplicación para la Toma de Decisiones sobre Acciones de Mejoramiento de Gestión Tecnológica en Empresas de Distribución Eléctrica. II Encuentro Colombiano de Dinámica de Sistemas. Santa Marta, Colombia.	spa
dc.relation.references	Richmond, B. (1993). Systems thinking: critical thinking skills for the 1990s and beyond. System Dynamics Review, 9(2), 113-33	spa
dc.relation.references	Rieber, L. P. (1994). Computers, Graphics and Learning. Madison, WI: Brown and Benchmark	spa
dc.relation.references	Sawicka, A., Molkenthin, R. (2005). Cognitive Load Dynamics: How to Increase Effectiveness of System Dynamics-Based Learning Environments. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Boston.	spa
dc.relation.references	Schieritz, N. (2002). Integrating System Dynamics and Agent-Based Modeling. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Palermo	spa
dc.relation.references	Schieritz, N. & Grössler, A. (2003). Emergent Structures in Supply Chains - A Study Integrating Agent-Based and System Dynamics Modeling. Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.	spa
dc.relation.references	Schieritz, N. & Milling, P. (2003). Modeling the Forest or Modeling the Trees. A Comparison of System Dynamics and Agent-Based Simulation. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, New York.	spa
dc.relation.references	Schieritz, N. (2004). Exploring the Agent Vocabulary – Emergence and Evolution in System Dynamics. In: Coyle, Jonathan et al. (Hrsg.): Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Oxford	spa
dc.relation.references	Scholl, H. J. (2001a). Agent-based and System Dynamics Modeling : A Call for Cross Study and Joint Research. Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences	spa
dc.relation.references	Scholl, H. J. (2001b). Looking Across the Fence: Comparing Findings From SD Modeling Efforts With those of Other Modeling Techniques. Presented at 2001 Annual International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Atlanta, GA.	spa
dc.relation.references	Shalizi, C. R. (2006). Methods and techniques of complex systems science: an overview. Center for the Study of Complex Systems, University of Michigan.	spa
dc.relation.references	Senge, P. (1994). La Quinta disciplina en la práctica. Barcelona, España: Ediciones Granica S.A.	spa
dc.relation.references	Spector, J. M. & Davidsen, P. I. (1998). Constructing Learning Environments Using System Dynamics. Journal of Courseware Engineering 1, 5-12.	spa
dc.relation.references	Sterman, J. (1989). Modeling Managerial Behavior: Misperceptions of Feedback in a Dynamic Decision making Experiment. Management Science, 35(3), 321-339	spa
dc.relation.references	Sterman, J. D. (1994). Learning in and about complex systems. System Dynamics Review, 10 (2-3), 291 – 330.	spa
dc.relation.references	Sterman, J. D. (2002). All models are wrong: reflections on becoming a systems scientist [Abstract]. System Dynamics Review, 18 (4), 501–531	spa
dc.relation.references	Wakeland, W.W., Gallaher, E.J., Macovsky, L.M. & Aktipis, C.A. (2004). A comparison of system dynamics and agent-based simulation applied to the study of cellular receptor dynamics. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conferen	spa
dc.relation.references	Wooldridge, M. (2002). An Introduction to Multiagent Systems. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd	spa
dc.relation.references	Zambonelli, F., Jennings, N. R. & Wooldridge, M. (2003). Developing Multiagent Systems: The Gaia Methodology. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 12 (3), 317-370.	spa
dc.contributor.cvlac	https://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0000639095	*
dc.contributor.scopus	https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57189464324	*
dc.subject.lemb	Simulación por computadores	spa
dc.subject.lemb	Agentes inteligentes	spa
dc.subject.lemb	Programa para computador	spa
dc.subject.lemb	Análisis de sistemas	spa
dc.subject.lemb	Ingeniería de sistemas	spa
dc.subject.lemb	Ciencia computacionales	spa
dc.subject.lemb	Investigaciones	spa
dc.subject.lemb	Análisis	spa
dc.subject.lemb	Tecnología educativa	spa
dc.contributor.corporatename	Instituto Tecnológico de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey (ITESM)	spa
dc.description.abstractenglish	The understanding of complex systems, including both their structure and their behavior over time, is necessary to properly address the solution of problems in the real world, characterized by its increasing level of complexity. Given this need, interactive learning environments, or computer-based microworlds, are presented as a support tool that, using models and simulations, allows the exercise of our mental models and the improvement of decision-making in the face of complex nature. and sometimes counter-intuitive to these systems. While the SD community has already been working on these learning environments, AB's foray into the field of modeling and simulation is more recent and so are its work in the field of learning. This work aims to explore the contribution that the integration of the two paradigms, SD and AB, could have in an interactive learning environment, using as a case study a microworld oriented to the understanding of complex systems.	eng
dc.subject.proposal	Dinámica de sistemas
dc.subject.proposal	Modelado y simulación basados en agentes
dc.subject.proposal	Informática educativa
dc.subject.proposal	Micromundo
dc.type.redcol	http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM
dc.rights.creativecommons	Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia	*
dc.contributor.researchgroup	Grupo de Investigación Pensamiento Sistémico - GPS	spa
dc.contributor.researchgroup	Grupo de Investigaciones Clínicas	spa
dc.coverage.campus	UNAB Campus Bucaramanga	spa
dc.description.learningmodality	Modalidad Presencial	spa