Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorLubinus Badillo, Federico Guillermospa
dc.contributor.advisorValenzuela Santos, Dianaspa
dc.contributor.advisorLizarazo Rodríguez, Cristianspa
dc.contributor.advisorCarrillo Parada, Manuelaspa
dc.contributor.advisorOchoa Vera, Miguel Enriquespa
dc.contributor.authorZúñiga Hadechni, Evelin Elenaspa
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-26T20:07:19Z
dc.date.available2020-06-26T20:07:19Z
dc.date.issued2018-08
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/1868
dc.description.abstractEl trasplante de riñón es la opción final para los pacientes con enfermedad renal en etapa terminal, pero tiene las desventajas de la disponibilidad limitada de los donantes y la alta incidencia de rechazo por el huésped. La ecografía en escala de grises y el eco Doppler son técnicas muy útiles, de bajo costo y asequibles, que ayudan al diagnóstico de la enfermedad de base que lleva al paciente a la insuficiencia renal como lo son la nefropatía isquémica secundario a la estenosis de las arterias renales, la poliquistosis la hipertensión y la diabetes.1,2 La ecografía permite una identificación temprana de la disfunción orgánica, evalúa las características del flujo renal y realiza una aproximación diagnostica. Adicionalmente, sirve como guía para la realización de procedimientos y seguimiento de las complicaciones post trasplante. La ecografía Doppler se ha convertido en la primera técnica de imagen para la evaluación de pacientes trasplantados, siendo el índice de resistencia y el tiempo de aceleración herramientas útiles, con alta especificidad pero con baja sensibilidad como marcadores de rechazo renal.spa
dc.description.tableofcontents1. PLANTEAMIENTO DEL PROBLEMA ……………8 2. JUSTIFICACION ……………9 3. OBJETIVOS ……………..10 3.1 General ……………....10 3.2 Específicos ………….10 4. MARCO TEÓRICO ………...11 5. METOLOGÍA ……………..16 5.1 Tipo de estudio ………16 5.2 Población ……………..16 5.3 Selección de pacientes ………...16 5.4 Muestra …………..16 5.5 Variables ………17 5.6 Recolección de la información …………...19 5.7 Plan de análisis estadístico……………….20 5.8 Consideraciones éticas………………20 6. RESULTADOS ………………24 7. DISCUSION……………………….32 8. CONCLUSIONES …………………..38spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/*
dc.titleÍndice veno-arterial: un signo prometedor en el rechazo renalspa
dc.title.translatedVeno-arterial index: a promising sign in renal rejectioneng
dc.degree.nameEspecialista en Radiología e Imágenes Diagnósticasspa
dc.coverageBucaramanga (Colombia)spa
dc.publisher.grantorUniversidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNABspa
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad Ciencias de la Saludspa
dc.publisher.programEspecialización en Radiología e Imágenes Diagnósticasspa
dc.description.degreelevelEspecializaciónspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.localTesisspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.subject.keywordsKidney biopsyeng
dc.subject.keywordsKidney diseaseseng
dc.subject.keywordsKidney transplanteng
dc.subject.keywordsSpectral Ultrasonographyeng
dc.subject.keywordsDopplereng
dc.subject.keywordsMedicineeng
dc.subject.keywordsRadiologyeng
dc.subject.keywordsDiagnostic imageseng
dc.subject.keywordsDiagnostic imagingeng
dc.subject.keywordsX-rayseng
dc.subject.keywordsInvestigationseng
dc.subject.keywordsAnalysiseng
dc.subject.keywordsTransplanted kidneyeng
dc.subject.keywordsArterial and venous velocitieseng
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNABspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional UNABspa
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.relation.referencesZúñiga Hadechni, Evelin Elena (2018). Índice veno-arterial: un signo prometedor en el rechazo renal. Bucaramanga (Santander, Colombia) : Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNABspa
dc.relation.referencesDanovitch GM. The Transplant Operation and its Surgical Complications. En: Handbook of kidney transplantation. 3 ed; 2001:146-61.spa
dc.relation.referencesMerino R, Martín de Francisco AL, Gómez Fleitas M, Áreas M. El trasplante en el nuevo milenio. En: Hernando Avendaño L, Aljama P, Arias M, Caramelo C, Egido J, Lamas S. Nefrología Clínica. 2 ed. Madrid: Panamericana; 2003:9.spa
dc.relation.referencesBurgos FJ, Marcen R, Pascual J. and cols.“Carcinoma renal y trasplante renal”. Urol. Integr. Invest. 2005; 10(1):46-54.spa
dc.relation.referencesStiles K, Moffatt M, Agodoa L. and cols.“Renal cell carcinoma as cause of end-stage renal disease in the United States: Patient charac- teristics and survival”. Kidney Internat. 2003; 64:247.spa
dc.relation.referencesDodd GD, 3rd, Tublin ME, Shah A and Zajko AB. Imaging of vascular complications associated with renal transplants. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;157: 449-59.spa
dc.relation.referencesRush DN, Henry SF, Jeffery JR. Histological findings in early routine biopsies of stable renal allograft recipients. Transplantation.1994 Jan; 57(2):208-11.spa
dc.relation.referencesShapiro R, Jordan ML, Scantlebury VP. Renal allograft rejection with normal renal function in simultaneous kidney/pancreas recipients. Transplant. Direct. 2000; 69:440.spa
dc.relation.referencesRoberts IS, Reddy S, Russell C. and cols. Subclinical rejection and borderline changes in early protocol biopsy specimens after renal transplantation. Transplant. Direct. 2004 Apr; 77(8):1194-8.spa
dc.relation.referencesSuthanthiran M, Schwartz JE, Ding R et al. Urinary-cell mRNA profile and acute cellular rejection in kidney allografts. N Engl J Med 2013 Jul; 369(1):20–31.spa
dc.relation.referencesRifkin MD, Needleman L, Pasto ME, Kurtz AB, Foy PM, McGlynn E et al. Evaluation of renal transplant rejection by duplex Doppler examination: value of the resistive index. AJR Am J Roentgenol.1987 Apr; 148(4):759-62.spa
dc.relation.referencesEinollahi B, Bakhtiari P, Simforoosh N, Lessan-Pezeshki M. et al. Renal allograft accumulation of technetium-99m sulfur colloid as a predictor of graft rejection. Transplant Proc 2005; 37(7):2973–75.spa
dc.relation.referencesLovinfosse P, Weekers L, Bonvoisin C, Bovy C. et al. Fluorodeoxyglu- cose F(18) positron emission tomography coupled with com- puted tomography in suspected acute renal allograft rejection. Am J Transplant. 2016 Jan; 16(1):310–16.spa
dc.relation.referencesSpurney RF, Ibrahim S, Butterly D. et al. Leukotrienes in renal transplant rejection in rats. Distinct roles for leukotriene B4 and peptidoleukotrienes in the pathogenesis of allograft injury. J Immunol. 1994; 152:867–76.spa
dc.relation.referencesSoulez M, Pilon EA, Dieudé M, Cardinal H. et al. The perlecan fragment LG3 is a novel regulator of obliterative remodeling associated with allograft vascular rejection. Circ Res. 2012 Jan; 110(1):94–104spa
dc.relation.referencesReuter S, Schnöckel U, Schröter R, Schober O. et al. Non-invasive imaging of acute renal allograft rejection in rats using small animal F- FDG - PET. PLoS One. 2009; 4(4): e5296.spa
dc.relation.referencesSzolar DH, Preidler K, Ebner F. et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of human renal allografts during the post- transplant period: preliminary observations. Magn Reson Imaging. 1997; 15:727–35.spa
dc.relation.referencesBoas FE, Desser TS, Kamaya A. Does separating the resistive index into pre- and post-glomerular resistance and vascular compliance improve the diagnostic accuracy of renal transplant Doppler ultrasound?. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196(5):A31-35.spa
dc.relation.referencesOzkan F, Yavuz YC, Inci MF, Altunoluk B. et al. Interobserver variability of ultrasound elastography in transplant kidneys: correlations with clinical-Doppler parameters. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013 Jan; 39(1):4–9.spa
dc.relation.referencesYamamoto A, Zhang JL, Rusinek H, Chandarana H. et al. Quantitative evaluation of acute renal transplant dysfunction with low-dose three-dimensional MR renography. Radiology. 2011 Sep; 260(3):781–89.spa
dc.relation.referencesPerazella MA, Reilly RF. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: recommendations for gadolinium-based contrast use in patients with kidney disease. Semin Dial. 2008; 21: 171–73.spa
dc.relation.referencesAbu-Alfa AK. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and gadolinium- based contrast agents. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2011 May; 18(3):188–98.spa
dc.relation.referencesAbou-El-Ghar ME, El-Diasty TA, El-Assmy AM et al. Role of dif- fusion-weighted MRI in diagnosis of acute renal allograft dysfunction: a prospective preliminary study. Br J Radiol. 2012 Jun; 85(1014):e206–e211.spa
dc.relation.referencesKaul A, Sharma RK, Gupta RK et al. Assessment of allograft function using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in kidney transplant patients. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2014; 25(6):1143–47.spa
dc.relation.referencesEisenberger U, Thoeny HC, Binser T et al. Evaluation of renal allograft function early after transplantation with diffusion- weighted MR imaging. Eur Radiol. 2010 Jun; 20(6): 1374–83.spa
dc.relation.referencesLerner RM, Huang SR, Parker KJ. “Sonoelasticity” images derived from ultrasound signals in mechanically vibrated tissues. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1990; 16(3): 231–9.spa
dc.relation.referencesKonofagou EE. Quo vadis elasticity imaging?. Ultrasonics. 2004 Apr; 42(1-9): 331–6.spa
dc.relation.referencesNational Kidney Foundation. Organ Donation and Transplantation Statistics. [Internet] [Consultado 2018 Jun 08]. Disponible en: https:// www.kidney.org/news/newsroom/factsheets/Organ-Donation-and-Transplanta- tion-Stats; 2015.spa
dc.relation.referencesHorrow MM, Parsikia A, Zaki R, Ortiz J. Immediate postoperative sonography of renal transplants: vascular findings and outcomes. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Sept; 201(3): W479–86.spa
dc.relation.referencesGhirardo G, De Franceschi M, Vidal E, Vidoni A, Ramondo G, Benetti E, et al. Trans- plant renal artery stenosis in children: risk factors and outcome after endovascular treatment. Pediatr Nephrol. 2014 Mar; 29(3): 461–7.spa
dc.relation.references30. Lorenzen J, Schneider A, Körner K, Regier M, Adam G, Nolte-Ernsting C. Post-biopsy arteriovenous fistula in transplant kidney: treatment with superselective transcath- eter embolisation. Eur J Radiol. 2012 May;81(5): e721–6.spa
dc.relation.references31. Deane C, Walters H, Taube D. Colour duplex ultrasound diagnosis of venous stenoses in renal allografts. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1990;16(3): 313–6.spa
dc.relation.referencesOlliff S, Negus R, Deane C, Walters H. Renal transplant vein stenosis: demonstration and percutaneous venoplasty of a new vascular complication in the transplant kid- ney. Clin Radiol. 1991 Jan;43(1): 42–6.spa
dc.relation.referencesWilkinson A. The “first quarter”. The first three months after transplant. En: Danovitch GM, editor. Handbook of Kidney Transplantation. Philadelphia: Williams and Wilkins; 2009: 198–216.spa
dc.relation.referencesStein A, Higgins R, Wild J. The first three months. En: Stein A, Higgins R, Wild J, edi- tors. Kidney transplants explained. London: Class Publishing; 2008: 89–101.spa
dc.relation.referencesKaveggia LP, Perrella RR, Grant EG, Tessler FN et al. Duplex Doppler sonography in renal allografts: the significance of reversed diastolic flow in diastole. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990;155: 295–298.spa
dc.relation.referencesRumack CM, Wilson SR, Charboneau JW. Diagnostico por Ecografía. 3 ed. España; 2014.spa
dc.relation.referencesBased on OPTN/UNOS data as 2016.spa
dc.relation.referencesBoas FE, Desser TS, Kamaya A. Does separating the resistive index into pre- and post-glomerular resistance and vascular compliance improve the diagnostic accuracy of renal transplant Doppler ultrasound?. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196(5): A87.spa
dc.relation.referencesGamarra G, Gómez J. Rechazo en pacientes con trasplante renal. Acta medica colombiana. Sept 1991;16(5): 244-255.spa
dc.relation.referencesRacusen LC, Solez K, Colvin RB, Bonsib SM et al. The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int 1999; 55(2): 713-23.spa
dc.relation.referencesSolez K, Benediktsson H, Cavallo T, Croker B, Demetris AJ et al. Report of the Third Banff Conference on Allograft Pathology (July 20-24, 1995) on classification and lesion scoring in renal allograft pathology. Transplant Proc 1996;28: 441-4.spa
dc.relation.referencesSoderberg-Naucler C, Emery VC. Viral infections and their impact on chronic renal allograft dys- function. Transplantation 2001;71(11 Suppl): SS24-30.spa
dc.relation.referencesCameron J, Rigby RJ, van Deth AG, Petrie JJ. Severe tubulo-interstitial disease in a renal allo- graft due to cytomegalovirus infection. Clin Neph- rol 1982; 18: 321-5.spa
dc.relation.referencesRandhawa PS, Finkelstein S, Scantlebury V, Shapiro R. Human polyoma virus-associated interstitial nephritis in the allograft kidney. Trans- plantation 1999;67: 103-9.spa
dc.relation.referencesIto M, Hirabayashi N, Uno Y, Nakayama A, Asai J. Necrotizing tubulointerstitial nephritis associated with adenovirus infection. Hum Pathol. 1991;22: 1225-31.spa
dc.relation.referencesRandhawa P, Demetris AJ, Pietrzak B, Nalesnik M. Histopathology of renal posttransplant lymphoproliferation: comparison with rejection using the Banff schema. Am J Kidney Dis 1996;28: 578-84.spa
dc.relation.referencesGulati M, Palmer SL, Im YM, Jadvar H et al. Duplex Doppler sonography: is there clinical relevance to elevated renal vein velocity in kidney transplants?. Clinical imaging 2016; 40(6): 1237-45.spa
dc.relation.referencesUtilidad en la relación aclaramiento de creatinina- indice de resistencia de la ecografia doppler renal como predictor de rechazo agudo en riñones transplantados. R. Cobeñas, N. Larrañaga, J.C Gallo. Abril, 2016.spa
dc.contributor.cvlachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001475552*
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1741-7016*
dc.contributor.researchgatehttps://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/Federico-Guillermo-Lubinus-Badillo-2173386520*
dc.subject.lembBiopsia renalspa
dc.subject.lembEnfermedades renalesspa
dc.subject.lembTrasplante renalspa
dc.subject.lembUltrasonografía espectralspa
dc.subject.lembDopplerspa
dc.subject.lembMedicinaspa
dc.subject.lembRadiologíaspa
dc.subject.lembImágenes diagnósticasspa
dc.subject.lembDiagnóstico por imagenspa
dc.subject.lembRadiografíasspa
dc.subject.lembInvestigacionesspa
dc.subject.lembAnálisisspa
dc.description.abstractenglishKidney transplantation is the final option for patients with end-stage renal disease, but it has the disadvantages of limited donor availability and a high incidence of host rejection. Gray-scale ultrasound and Doppler echo are very useful, low-cost and affordable techniques that help diagnose the underlying disease that leads to kidney failure, such as ischemic nephropathy secondary to stenosis of the arteries. renal arteries, polycystic hypertension, and diabetes.1,2 Ultrasound allows an early identification of organ dysfunction, evaluates the characteristics of renal flow and performs a diagnostic approach. Additionally, it serves as a guide for performing procedures and monitoring post-transplant complications.eng
dc.subject.proposalRiñón trasplantadospa
dc.subject.proposalVelocidades arteriales y venosasspa
dc.rights.creativecommonsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia*


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia