Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.advisorVarón Plata, Clara Leonorspa
dc.contributor.authorJaramillo Solá, José Agustínspa
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-26T20:01:39Z
dc.date.available2020-06-26T20:01:39Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/1771
dc.description.abstractOBJETIVO: Establecer la relación entre los tipos de traumas oculares en pacientes con cuerpo extraño intraocular y la agudeza visual postoperatoria. DISEÑO: Descriptivo, trasversal, retrospectivo. MUESTRA: 46 ojos de 46 pacientes que presentaron traumas con cuerpo extraño intraocular, atendidos y operados en la Fundación Oftalmológica de Santander entre Enero de 2000 y Diciembre de 2012. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Se revisaron las historias de los pacientes y se ingresaron los datos de los pacientes en una tabla de Excel y en el programa estadístico Stata para su análisis. RESULTADOS: El 100% de los pacientes fueron hombres, el promedio de edad fue de 32.06 años. El tipo de trauma más frecuente fue puntilla en 20 ojos (43.47 %), seguido de trauma por guadañadora en 16 ojos (34.78%), perdigones 6 ojos (13.04%) y por accidente de tránsito en 4 ojos (8.69%). La agudeza visual preoperatoria fue en su mayoría percepción de luz 28.3%, cuenta dedos 23.9%, y movimiento de manos 21.7%. Y la agudeza visual postoperatoria fue cuenta dedos 23.9%, percepción de luz 23.9% y no percepción de luz 13.0 %. Las estructuras anatómicas oculares lesionadas por el CEIO son ruptura de iris en 82.6%, herida de cornea 78.3%, catarata 65.2%, herida escleral 45.7%, desprendimiento de retina 23.9%, hifema 19.6% y exposición uveal 4.3 %. Como factor asociado a mala agudeza visual postoperatoria se encuentra agudeza visual igual o peor a cuenta dedos. Se presentaron 14 casos de endoftalmitis preoperatoria (30.43%), el material del cuerpo extraño más frecuentemente encontrado fue metal en 11 ojos (23.91%) y madera en 3 ojos (6.52%). Los gérmenes causales fueron Staphylococcus aereus en 13.04%, Bacillus SP en 4.34% y Actinomiceto en 10.86%. CONCLUSIONES: Los CEIO se presentan más frecuentemente en varones jóvenes, y se asocian a actividades laborales. El compromiso de la agudeza visual es importante y se obtienen en su mayoría agudezas visuales iguales o peores a cuenta dedos. Las estructuras anatómicas oculares lesionadas con mayor frecuencia son el iris, cornea, cristalino y esclera. La mala agudeza visual preoperatoria se asocia a mala agudeza visual postoperatoria. El tipo de cirugía depende del criterio del cirujano pero si hay lesión del cristalino e integridad del saco capsular y/o zónula puede implantarse lente intraocular en un en el mismo procedimiento quirúrgico. Así mismo se recomienda la aplicación de vancomicina y ceftazidima intravitreos al concluir la cirugía en los casos con riesgo alto de endoftalmitis o cuando se sospeche de su presencia. La endoftalmitis se presentó preoperatoriamente en 30.43% de los casos y el germen más frecuente es Staphylococcus aereus. Deben implementarse políticas para mejorar las medidas de seguridad en pacientes cuyas actividades laborales y/o recreacionales representen riesgos.spa
dc.description.tableofcontents1. Resumen 2. Planteamiento del problema 3. Justificación 4. Marco Teórico 5. Objetivos 6. Metodología 7. Resultados 8. Discusión 9. Conclusiones 10. Bibliografíaspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/*
dc.titleRelación entre los tipos de traumas oculares en pacientes con cuerpo extraño intraocular y la agudeza visual postoperatoriaspa
dc.title.translatedRelationship between types of ocular trauma in patients with intraocular foreign body and postoperative visual acuityeng
dc.degree.nameEspecialista en Oftalmologíaspa
dc.coverageBucaramanga (Santander, Colombia)spa
dc.publisher.grantorUniversidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNABspa
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad Ciencias de la Saludspa
dc.publisher.programEspecialización en Oftalmologíaspa
dc.description.degreelevelEspecializaciónspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.localTesisspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.subject.keywordsEye traumaeng
dc.subject.keywordsVisual acuityeng
dc.subject.keywordsPostoperative complicationseng
dc.subject.keywordsMedicineeng
dc.subject.keywordsOphthalmologyeng
dc.subject.keywordsResearcheng
dc.subject.keywordsVieweng
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNABspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional UNABspa
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.relation.referencesJaramillo Solá, José Agustín (2014). Relación entre los tipos de traumas oculares en pacientes con cuerpo extraño intraocular y la agudeza visual postoperatoria. Bucaramanga (Santander, Colombia) : Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNABspa
dc.relation.references1. Pérez Blázquez GJ, Martínez Ribalta J. Traumatismos oculares. 1992.spa
dc.relation.references2. David N. Zacks, M.D., Ph.D. Lois Hart, R.D.M.S. Lucy H. Y. Young, M.D., Ph.D. Ultrasonography in the Traumatized Eye: Intraocular Foreign Body Versus Artifact.spa
dc.relation.references3. Glynn R, Seddon J, Berlin B. The incidence of eye injuriesin New England adults. Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106:785-789 10. Karlson T, Klein B. The incidence of acute hospital treated eye injuries. Arch Ophthalmol 1986;104:1473-1476.spa
dc.relation.references4. Negrel AD, Thylefors B. United States Eye Injury Registry. Eye Trauma epidemiologyand prevention. www.useironline.org/Prevention.htm. The global impact of eye injuries. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1998;5:143-169.spa
dc.relation.references5. Globocnik Petrovic M, Lumi X, Drnovsek Olup B. Prognostic factors in open eye injury managed with vitrectomy: retrospective study. Croat Med J 2004; 45(3):299–303.spa
dc.relation.references6. Glynn R, Seddon J, Berlin B. The incidence of eye injuries in New England adults. Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106:785-789.spa
dc.relation.references7. Karlson T, Klein B. The incidence of acute hospital treated eye injuries. Arch Ophthalmol 1986;104:1473-1476.spa
dc.relation.references8. Greven CM, Engelbrecht NE, Slusher MM, et al. Intraocular foreign bodies: management, prognostic factors, and visual outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2000;107: 608–6.spa
dc.relation.references9. Williams DF, Mieler WF, Abrams GW, et al. Results and prognostic factors in penetrating ocular injuries with retained intraocular foreign bodies. Ophthalmology. 1988;95:911–916.spa
dc.relation.references10. Andrea Galvis, MD Oph 1 Virgilio Galvis, MD Oph 2 John Bareño, MD, Res Oph 3 Juan Jose Rey, MD Epidemiología del trauma ocular en el Nororiente Colombiano. Epid Revista SCO 2005 · 38-2 : x – y.spa
dc.relation.references11. Nihal Demircan, MD, Merih Soylu, MD, Meltem Yagmur, MD, Handan Akkaya, MD, Altan Atakan Ozcan, MD, and Ilter Varinli, MD. Pars Plana Vitrectomy in Ocular Injury with Intraocular Foreign Body. 1216 November 2005.spa
dc.relation.references12. Puane.T.P, Jaeaer. E.A. Vo. 3.Cap.38 .Pao .76-2 0 U Vol.15 -r>n n 7-5 Hafiper And Voto Publ/skers. Pklladelvkla 7982.spa
dc.relation.references13. Kansky J. Traumatismos. En: Oftalmología Clínica. Madrid: Editorial Elsevier; 2004, p. 669-69.spa
dc.relation.references14. Behrens-Baumann W, Praetorius G. Intraocular foreign bodies. 297 consecutive cases. Ophthalmologica. 1989; 198: 84- 8.spa
dc.relation.references15. Dhir SP, Mohan K, Munjal VP, et al. Perforating ocular injuries with retained intra-ocular foreign bodies. Indian J Ophthalmol. 1984; 32: 289-92.spa
dc.relation.references16. Lai YK, Moussa M. Perforating eye injuries due to intraocular foreign bodies. Med J Malaysia. 1992; 47: 212-9.spa
dc.relation.references17. Ahmadieh H, Soheilian M, Sajjadi H, et al. Vitrectomy in ocular trauma factors influencing final visual outcome. Retina 1993; 13: 107-13. Consensus Report. Retained Intraocular Foreign Body Pak J Ophthalmol 2010, Vol. 26 No. 3.spa
dc.relation.references18. Open globe injuries are rarely hopeless. Managing the open globe calls for creativity and flexibility of surgical approach tailored to the specific case. Review of Ophthalmology. 2005; 12: 6.spa
dc.relation.references19. Yeh S, Colyer MH, Weichel C, Weichel E. Current trends in the management of intraocular foreign bodies. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2008;19(3):225-33.spa
dc.relation.references20. Thomas D. Duane´s. Duanes Clinical Ophthalmology (CD-ROM). Philadelphia: Lippincott William & Wilkins; 2004.spa
dc.relation.references21. Dra. Diley Pérez García,I Dr. Roberto Alejandro Guerra García,I Dr. Raúl Rúa Martínez, I Dr. Jorge Alberto Llerena Rodríguez. Cuerpo extraño intraocular en el segmento posterior Intraocular. Instituto Cubano de Oftalmología “Ramón Pando Ferrer”. Revista Cubana de Oftalmología 2012;25(Supl 2):561-572. La Habana, Cuba.spa
dc.relation.references22. Consensus Report. Retained Intraocular Foreign Body. Pak J Ophthalmol 2010, Vol. 26 No. 3.spa
dc.relation.references23. Pieramici DJ. Open globe injuries are rarely hopeless. Managing the open globe calls for creativity and flexibility of surgical approach tailored to the specific case. Review of Ophthalmology. 2005; 12: 6.spa
dc.relation.references24. Budde WM, Junemann A (1998) Chalcosis oculi. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilk 212: 184−185.spa
dc.relation.references25. Monterio ML, Ulrich RF, Imes RK, Fung WE, Hoyt WF (1984) Iron mydriasis. Am J Ophthalmol 97: 794−796.spa
dc.relation.references26. Weiss MJ, Hofeldt AJ, Behrens M, Fisher K (1997) Ocular siderosis. Diagnosis and management. Retina 17: 105−108.spa
dc.relation.references27. Yamaguchi K, Tamai M (1989) Siderosis bulbi induced by intraocular lens implantation.spa
dc.relation.references28. Memon AA, Iqbal MS, Cheema A et al. Visual outcome and complications after removal of posterior segment intraocular foreign bodies through pars plana approach. JCPSP. 2009; 19 : 436-9.spa
dc.relation.references29. Katz G, Moisseiev J. Posterior-segment intraocular foreign bodies: An update on management. Risks of infection, scarring and vision loss are among the many concerns to address. Retinal Physician. 2009.spa
dc.relation.references30. Brown I (1968) Nature of injury. Int Ophthalmol Clin 8: 147−152.spa
dc.relation.references31. Kanski JJ. Trauma. In: Kanski JJ Clinical Ophthalmology. A systemic approach 6th ed. Butterworth Heinemann. 2007; 847- 68.spa
dc.relation.references32. Pieramici DJ. Open globe injuries are rarely hopeless. Managing the open globe calls for creativity and flexibility of surgical approach tailored to the specific case. Review of Ophthalmology. 2005; 12: 6.spa
dc.relation.references33. Bray LC, Griffiths PG. The value of plain radiography in suspected intraocular foreign body. Eye 1991; 5: 751–754. Bryden FM, Pyott AA, Bailey M, McGhee CN. Real time ultrasound in the assessment of intraocular bodies. Eye 1990; 4: 727–731.spa
dc.relation.references34. Byrne SF, Green RL. Ultrasound of the eye and orbit. St. Louis: Mosby–Year Book, 1992.spa
dc.relation.references35. Guthoff R. Ultrasound in ophthalmic diagnosis. A practical guide. New York: Thieme Medical, 1991.spa
dc.relation.references36. David N. Zacks, M.D., Ph.D. Lois Hart, R.D.M.S. Lucy H. Y. Young, M.D., Ph.D. Ultrasonography in the Traumatized Eye: Intraocular Foreign Body Versus Artifact. Ultrasonography in Eye Trauma _ 123.spa
dc.relation.references37. Nair UK, Aldave AJ, Cunningham ET Jr. Ophthalmic Pearls: Trauma. Identifying intraocular foreign bodies. EyeNet Magazine Oct 2007. Edited by Scott IU, Fekrat S.spa
dc.relation.references38. Thompson JT, Parver LM, Enger CL, et al. Infectious endophthalmitis afterpenetrating injuries with retained intraocular foreign bodies. National Eye Trauma System. Ophthalmology. 1993;100:1468–1474.spa
dc.relation.references39. Knox FA, Best RM, Kinsella F, et al. Management of endophthalmitis with retained intraocular foreign body. Eye2004; 18: 179-82.spa
dc.relation.references40. Mittra RA, Mieler WF. Controversies in the management of open globe injuries involving the posterior segment. Surv Ophthalmol. 1999; 44: 215-25.spa
dc.relation.references41. Chaudhary IA, Shamsi FA, Al-Harthi E, et al. Incidence and visual outcome of endophthalmitis associated with intraocular foreign bodies. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008; 246: 181-6.spa
dc.relation.references42. Shipman JS, Delaney JH, Seely RH. Magnet extraction of intraocular foreign bodies by anterior and posterior routes; a survey of 150 cases. Am J Ophthalmol. 1953;36(5):620 Y 628.spa
dc.relation.references43. McCaslin MF. Management of intraocular foreign bodies. Eye Ear Nose Throat Mon. 1963;42:46 Y 52.spa
dc.relation.references44. Percival SP. Late complications from posterior segment intraocular foreign bodies with particular reference to retinal detachment. Br J Ophthalmol. 1972;5 (6):462 Y 468.spa
dc.relation.references45. Machemer R. A new concept for vitreous surgery. Surgical technique and complications. Am J Ophthalmol. 1972;74(6):1022 Y 1033.spa
dc.relation.references46. Irvine AR. Old and new techniques combined in the management of intraocular foreign bodies. Ann Ophthalmol. 1981;13(1):41Y47. 10. Coleman DJ, Lucas BC, Rondeau MJ, et al. Management of intraocular foreign bodies. Ophthalmology. 1987;94 (12):1647 Y 1653.spa
dc.relation.references47. Greven CM, Engelbrecht NE, Slusher MM, et al. Intraocular foreign bodies: management, prognostic factors, and visual outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2000;107(3):608Y612. Kuhn F, Morris R. Posterior segment intraocular foreign bodies: management in the vitrectomy era. Ophthalmology. 2000; 107(5):821 Y 822.spa
dc.relation.references48. Williams DF, Mieler WF, Abrams GW, et al. Results and prognostic factors in penetrating ocular injuries with retained intraocular foreign bodies. Ophthalmology. 1988;95(7):911 Y 916.spa
dc.relation.references49. Lansing M, Glaser B, Liss H, Hanham A, Thompson J, Sjaarda R, Gordon A (1993) The effect of pars plana vitrectomy and transforming growth factor-beta 2 withoutepiretinal membrane peeling on full-thickness macular hole. Ophthalmology 100:868−872.spa
dc.relation.references50. Ocular trauma In: Kanski JJ. Clinical ophthalmology a systemic approach London: Butterworth Heineman. 2011; 871-95,spa
dc.relation.references51. J Choovuthayakorn, L Hansapinyo, N Ittipunkul, D Patikulsila and P Kunavisarut Eye. Predictive factors and outcomes of posterior segment intraocular foreign bodies (2011) 25, 1622–1626 & 2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0950-222X/11 www.nature.com/eye.spa
dc.relation.references52. A Cox , B Foot and CJ MacEwen. Surveillance of intraocular foreign bodies in the UK FR Imrie. Eye (2008) 22, 1141–1147 & 2008 Macmillan Publishers Limited. www.nature.com/eye.spa
dc.relation.references53. Shakir Zafar, Zeeshan Kamil, Munira Shakir, Syeda Aisha Bokhari, Syed Fawad Rizvi. Management of Intraocular Foreign Body in Tertiary Care Hospital.Pak J Ophthalmol 2012, Vol. 28 No. 3.spa
dc.relation.references54. Warrasak S, Euswas A, Hongsakorn S. Posterior segment trauma: types of injuries result of vitreo-retinal surgery and prophylactic broad encircling sclera buckle. J Med Assoc Thai. 2005; 88: 1916-30.spa
dc.relation.references55. Nihal Demircan, MD, Merih Soylu, MD, Meltem Yagmur, MD, Handan Akkaya, MD, Altan Atakan Ozcan, MD, and Ilter Varinli. Pars Plana Vitrectomy in Ocular Injury with Intraocular Foreign Body. The Journal of TRAUMA Injury, Infection, and Critical Care Volume 59 • Number 5.spa
dc.relation.references56. L. Wickham, W. Xing, C. Bunce, and P. Sullivan, “Outcomes of surgery for posterior segment intraocular foreign bodies—a retrospective review of 17 years of clinical experience,” Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 244, no. 12, pp. 1620–1626, 2006.spa
dc.relation.references57. M. Soheilian, M. Feghi, S. Yazdani et al., “Surgical management of non-metallic and non-magnetic metallic intraocular foreign bodies,” Ophthalmic Surgery Lasers and Imaging, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 189–196, 2005.spa
dc.relation.references58. Neelakshi Bhagat, MD, MPH, Saya Nagori, MD, and Marco Zarbin, MD, PhD major review. Post-traumatic Infectious Endophthalmitis. The Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, usa survey of ophthalmology volume 56 _ number 3 _ may–june 2011.spa
dc.relation.references59. Erakgun T, Egrilmez S.J Trauma. 2008 Apr;64(4):1034-7. Prognostic factors in vitrectomy for posterior segment intraocular foreign bodies.spa
dc.relation.references60. Ophthalmology. 2000 Mar;107(3):608-12.spa
dc.relation.references61. Jonas JB, Knorr HL, Budde WM. Prognostic factors in ocular injuries caused by intraocular or retrobulbar foreign bodies. Department of Ophthalmology and Eye Hospital, University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany). Ophthalmology. 2000 May;107(5):823-8.spa
dc.relation.references62. Arciniegas A, Araya R. Ann Ophthalmol. 1992 Dec;24 (12):453-8. Our experience in intraocular foreign-body removal. Source Barraquer Clinic, Bogota, Colombia.spa
dc.relation.references63. Woodcock MG, Scott RA, Huntbach J, Kirkby GR. Mass and shape as factors in intraocular foreign body injuries. Ophthalmology 2006; 113:2262–2269.spa
dc.relation.references64. Wani VB, Al-Ajmi M, Thalib L, et al. Vitrectomy for posterior segment intraocular foreign bodies: visual results and prognostic factors. Retina 2003; 23:654–660.spa
dc.relation.references65. Yeh S, Colyer MH, Weichel C, Weichel E. Current trends in the management of intraocular foreign bodies. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2008;19(3):225-33.spa
dc.relation.references66. Ehlers JP, Kunimoto DY, Ittoop S, Maguire JI, Ho AC, Regillo CD. Metallic intraocular foreign bodies: characteristics, interventions, and prognostic factors for visual outcome and globe survival. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146(3):427-33.spa
dc.relation.references67. Moisseiev J, Segev F, Harizman N, et al. Primary cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation in penetrating ocular trauma. Ophthalmology 2001; 108:1099–1103spa
dc.relation.references68. Baykara M, Dogru M, Ozcetin H, Erturk H. Primary repair and intraocular lens implantation after perforating eye injury. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002; 28:1832–1835.spa
dc.relation.references69. Ferencz JR, Assia EI, Diamantstein L, Rubinstein E. Vancomycin concentration in the vitreous after intravenous and intravitreal administration for postoperative endophthalmitis. Arch Ophthalmol 1999; 117:1023–1027.spa
dc.relation.references70. Meredith TA, Aguilar HE, Shaarawy A, Kincaid M, Dick J, Neisman MR. Vancomycin levels in vitreous cavity after intravenous administration. Am J Ophthalmol 1995;119:774-78.spa
dc.relation.references71. Roth DB, Flynn HW. Antibiotic selection in the treatment of endophthalmitis: The significance of drug combination and synergy. Surv Ophthalmol 1997;41:395-401.spa
dc.relation.references72. Mittra RA, Mieler WF. Controversies in management of open-globe injuries involving the posterior segment. Surv Ophthalmol 1999;44:215-25.spa
dc.relation.references73. Role of prophylactic intravitreal antibiotics in open globe injuries. S Narang, V Gupta, A Gupta, Mangat R Dogra, Surinder S Pandav, S Das Department of Ophthalmology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.spa
dc.relation.references74. Al-Omran AM, Abboud EB, Abu EL-Asrar AM. Microbiologic spectrum and visual outcome of post traumatic endophthalmitis. Retina. 2007; 27: 236-42.spa
dc.relation.references75. Essex RW, Yi Q, Charles PG, et al. Post-traumatic endophthalmitis. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(11):2015—22.spa
dc.relation.references76. D.Wilkin Parke III, Avinash Pathengay, HarryW. Flynn Jr., Thomas Albini, and Stephen G. Schwartz. Risk Factors for Endophthalmitis and Retinal Detachment with Retained Intraocular Foreign Bodies. Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA Correspondence should be addressed to HarryW. Flynn Jr., hflynn@med.miami.edu Received 6 January 2012; Accepted 29 February 2012.spa
dc.relation.references77. Barry P, Behrend-Baumann W, Pleyer V, Seal D. ESCRS Guidelines on prevention, investigation and management of post-operative endophthalmitis. Vesion 2. August 2007.spa
dc.relation.references78. Aggarwal P1, Garg P1, Sidhu HK. Post-traumatic endophthalmitis with retained intraocular foreign body – a case report with review of literature Department of Ophthalmology, 2Department of Microbiology Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences And Research, Mullana Ambala, Haryana, India Aggarwal P et al Post-traumatic endophthalmitis and intra-ocular foreign body Nepal J Ophthalmol 2012; 4 ( 7 ):187-190.spa
dc.relation.references79. Thompson JT, Parver LM, Enger CL, Mieler WF, Liggett PE (1993) Infectious endophthalmitis after penetrating injuries with retained foreign bodies. National eye trauma system. Ophthalmology 100:1468–1474.spa
dc.relation.references80. Ahmedieh H, Soheilian M, Sajjadi H, Azarmina M, Abrishami M. Vitrectomy in ocular trauma (factors influencing final visual outcome). Retina. 1993;13:107–113.spa
dc.relation.references81. Techniques of Intraocular Foreign Body Removal LTC Eric D. Weichel, MD* and Steven Yeh, MDÞ. Tech Ophthalmology 2009;7: 45 Y 52.spa
dc.relation.references82. C. Girkin, G. McGwin Jr, R. Morris, F. Kuhn Glaucoma following penetrating ocular trauma: A cohort study of the United States Eye Injury Registry. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2004; Vol 139:100-5.spa
dc.relation.references83. Francisco Andrighetti C, Luis Rivera A. Trauma Ocular y Causticaciones. Unidad de Trauma Ocular Hospital del Salvador.spa
dc.subject.lembTraumas ocularesspa
dc.subject.lembAgudeza visualspa
dc.subject.lembComplicaciones postoperatoriasspa
dc.subject.lembMedicinaspa
dc.subject.lembOftalmologíaspa
dc.subject.lembInvestigacionesspa
dc.description.abstractenglishOBJECTIVE To establish the relationship between the types of ocular trauma in patients with intraocular foreign body and postoperative visual acuity. DESIGN: Descriptive, transversal, retrospective. SAMPLE: 46 eyes of 46 patients who presented trauma with an intraocular foreign body, treated and operated on at the Santander Ophthalmology Foundation between January 2000 and December 2012. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patient records were reviewed and patient data was entered into an Excel table and Stata statistical program for analysis. RESULTS: 100% of the patients were men, the average age was 32.06 years. The most frequent type of trauma was toecap in 20 eyes (43.47%), followed by scythe trauma in 16 eyes (34.78%), pellets in 6 eyes (13.04%) and by traffic accident in 4 eyes (8.69%). Preoperative visual acuity was mostly light perception 28.3%, finger counting 23.9%, and hand movement 21.7%. And postoperative visual acuity was finger count 23.9%, light perception 23.9% and no light perception 13.0%. The ocular anatomical structures injured by CEIO are iris rupture in 82.6%, corneal injury 78.3%, cataract 65.2%, scleral injury 45.7%, retinal detachment 23.9%, hyphema 19.6% and uveal exposure 4.3%. As a factor associated with poor postoperative visual acuity, visual acuity is equal to or worse on finger counts. There were 14 cases of preoperative endophthalmitis (30.43%), the most frequently found foreign body material was metal in 11 eyes (23.91%) and wood in 3 eyes (6.52%). The causative germs were Staphylococcus aereus in 13.04%, Bacillus SP in 4.34% and Actinomycete in 10.86%. CONCLUSIONS: CEIOs occur more frequently in young men, and are associated with work activities. The compromise of visual acuity is important and the same or worse visual acuities are obtained for the most part on the finger count. The most frequently injured ocular anatomical structures are the iris, cornea, lens, and sclera. Poor preoperative visual acuity is associated with poor postoperative visual acuity. The type of surgery depends on the surgeon's criteria, but if there is lesion of the lens and integrity of the capsular bag and / or zonule, an intraocular lens can be implanted in one in the same surgical procedure. Likewise, the application of intravitreal vancomycin and ceftazidime is recommended at the conclusion of surgery in cases with high risk of endophthalmitis or when its presence is suspected. Endophthalmitis presented preoperatively in 30.43% of cases and the most frequent germ is Staphylococcus aereus. Policies should be implemented to improve safety measures for patients whose work and / or recreational activities pose risks.eng
dc.subject.proposalVisión
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM
dc.rights.creativecommonsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia*
dc.coverage.campusUNAB Campus Bucaramangaspa
dc.description.learningmodalityModalidad Presencialspa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia