Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorEscandón Barbosa, Diana
dc.contributor.authorSalas Paramo, Jairo
dc.contributor.authorCastro Aristizábal, Geovanny
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-30T15:38:24Z
dc.date.available2022-03-30T15:38:24Z
dc.date.issued2021-04
dc.identifier.issnISSN :: 1939-4675spa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/16109
dc.description.abstractPropósito: El propósito de esta investigación es identificar los efectos de saturación de la identificación, participación y cocreación de valor de la empresa consumidora en la industria de la moda y el automóvil en Colombia. Diseño/metodología/aproximación: Se ha definido utilizar el método de ecuaciones estructurales cuadráticas permitiendo analizar el comportamiento de las variables de forma no lineal, manteniendo las ventajas de los modelos de ecuaciones estructurales. Para alcanzar el objetivo se ha recabado una encuesta a 400 consumidores de los sectores Moda y Automotriz en Colombia que han participado en procesos de co-creación de valor. Hallazgos: Los resultados muestran que la implicación del consumidor tiene un nivel máximo de influencia en la identificación del consumidor con la empresa, a partir de lo cual los beneficios empiezan a disminuir tanto para el sector de la moda como para el de la automoción. En el caso de la co-creación de valor, también muestra que tiene un nivel máximo en el que su implementación tiene beneficios sobre la identificación de la empresa consumidora. Limitaciones/implicaciones de la investigación: Dentro de las limitaciones, se puede encontrar que la información utilizado describe particularidades de un país considerado en proceso de desarrollo donde sus características culturales pueden afectar las percepciones de los consumidores. Implicaciones prácticas: La mayoría de las empresas generan estrategias que les permiten mejorar las relaciones con sus consumidores a través de procesos colaborativos que les permiten agregar valor a sus procesos y productos. Sin embargo, dichas estrategias tienen comportamientos decrecientes en el tiempo que generan menor beneficio tanto en su desempeño como en la relación con sus clientes. De esta forma, las empresas tendrán evidencia de la necesidad de establecer planes temporales en los que una estrategia generará mayores beneficios. Implicaciones sociales: Los resultados de la investigación permiten comprender las características individuales y sociales que son fundamentales para la implementación de estrategias encaminadas a incluir al consumidor en los procesos de diseño para la creación de valor para la empresa. Originalidad/valor: La mayor parte de la literatura en el campo de la lógica dominante del Servicio se ha centrado en estudios empíricos que muestran los beneficios de la implementación de la co-creación de valor. Sin embargo, es posible encontrar estudios en los que se plantee la posibilidad de encontrar resultados en procesos de cocreación de valor poco satisfactorios tanto para las empresas como para el consumidor. Es precisamente en los resultados negativos que el presente estudio ha definido como propósito principal de la investigación.spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.relation.urihttps://www.abacademies.org/articles/dark-side-of-value-cocreation-strategies.pdfspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/*
dc.sourceInternational Journal of Entrepreneurship; Volumen 25, Número 04 (Diciembre 2021); páginas 011-17spa
dc.titleEl lado oscuro de la co-creación de valor estrategiasspa
dc.title.translatedDark side of value co-creation strategieseng
dc.publisher.grantorUniversidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNABspa
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad Economía y Negociosspa
dc.publisher.programPregrado Economíaspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.localArtículospa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.subject.keywordsCocreación de Valorspa
dc.subject.keywordsConsumer company identificationspa
dc.subject.keywordsConsumer engagementspa
dc.subject.keywordsEquation of the quadratic structural modelspa
dc.subject.keywordsCo-destructionspa
dc.subject.keywordsSaturation effectsspa
dc.subject.keywordsBusiness Administrationspa
dc.subject.keywordsBusiness Growthspa
dc.subject.keywordsMarketingspa
dc.subject.keywordsSurveysspa
dc.subject.keywordsValue addedspa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNABspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional UNABspa
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.relation.referencesAiken, L.S., & West, S.G. (1990). Invalidity of true experiments: Self-report pretest biases. Evaluation Review, 14, 374-390.spa
dc.relation.referencesAjzen, I., Rosenthal, L.H., & Brown, T. (2000). Effects of perceived fairness on willingness to pay. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 2439 - 2450spa
dc.relation.referencesAlgesheimer, E., Dholakia, U.M., & Herrmann, A. (2005). The social influence of brand community: Evidence from European car clubs. Journal of Marketing, 69(3). 19-34spa
dc.relation.referencesAlonso-Dos-Santos, M., Veinhardt, J., & Calabuig-Moreno, F. (2016) Involvement and image transfer in sports sponsorship. Engineering Economy-Engineering Economy, 27(1), 7-87 .spa
dc.relation.referencesAnderson, J.C., & Gerbing, D.W. (1988). Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A review & recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.spa
dc.relation.referencesArnould, E.J., Price L.L., & Malshe, A. (2006). Toward a Cultural Resource-Based Theory of the Customerspa
dc.relation.referencesLusch, R.F., & Vargo S.L. (Ed) In the service-dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate & directions, Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe, 320-333.spa
dc.relation.referencesAshforth, B.E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory & the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1). 20-39spa
dc.relation.referencesBaron, S., & Harris, K. (2008). Consumers as resource integrators. Journal of marketing management, 24(1/2), 113- 130.spa
dc.relation.referencesBartl, M., Füller, J., Mühlbacher, H., & Holger, E. (2006). A manager’s perspective on virtual customer integration for new product development. Journal of Production Innovation Management. Product Development & Management Associationspa
dc.relation.referencesBenitez, G.B., Ayala, N.F., & Frank, A.G. (2020). Industry 4.0 innovation ecosystems: An evolutionary perspective on value cocreation. International Journal of Production Economics, 228(107735).spa
dc.relation.referencesBlazquéz, M. (2014). Fashion shopping in multichannel retail: The role of technology in enhancing the customer experience. Journal International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 18(4).spa
dc.relation.referencesBlodgett, J.G., & Granbois, D.H. (1992). Toward an integrated conceptual model of consumer complaining behavior. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction & Complaining Behavior, 5, 93-103spa
dc.relation.referencesBourne, C. (2020). Fintech's transparency-publicity nexus: Value cocreation through transparency discourses in business-to-business digital marketing. American Behavioral Scientist, 64(11) special Issue 1607-1626spa
dc.relation.referencesBraunsberger, K., & Buckler, B (2011). What motivates consumers to participate in boycotts: Lessons from the ongoing Canadian seafood boycott'. Journal of Business Research, 64, 96-102.spa
dc.relation.referencesCaprara G.V., Steca, P., Zelli, A., & Capanna, C (2000). European a new scale for measuring adults’ prosocialness. Journal of Psychological Assessment.spa
dc.relation.referencesCarbonell, P., Rodriguez‐Escudero, A.I., & Pujari, D. (2009). Customer involvement in new service development: An examination of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(5), 536- 550spa
dc.relation.referencesChen, J.-S., Tsou, H.T., & Huang, A.Y.-H. (2009). Service delivery innovation: Antecedents and impact on firm performance. Journal of Service Research, 12(1), 36-55.spa
dc.relation.referencesChowdhury, I.N., Gruber, T., & Zolkiewski, J. (2016). Every cloud has a silver lining — Exploring the dark side of value co-creation in B2B service networks. Industrial Marketing Management. 55, 97-109.spa
dc.relation.referencesCova, B., & Salle, R. (2008). Marketing solutions in accordance with the SD logic: Cocreating value with customer network actors. Industrial Marketing Management, 37(3), 270-277spa
dc.relation.referencesDahan, E., & Hauser, J. (2002). The virtual customer. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19, 332-353.spa
dc.relation.referencesDaniela C., Ana Isabel Canhoto & Emanuel Said (2020) The dark side of AI-powered service interactions: exploring the process of co-destruction from the customer perspective, The Service Industries Journal.spa
dc.relation.referencesDawson, J.F., & Richter, A.W. (2006). Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: Development and application of a slope difference test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 917-926.spa
dc.relation.referencesDay, R.L., Grabicke, K., Schaetzle, T., & Staubach, F (1981). The hidden agenda of consumer complaining. Journal of Retailing, 57, 86-106.spa
dc.relation.referencesDong, B., Evans, K.R., & Zou, S (2008). The effects of customer participation in co-created service recovery. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1). 123-137spa
dc.relation.referencesDong, B., Evans, K., & Zou, S. (2008). The effects of customer participation in co-created service recovery. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 123-137.spa
dc.relation.referencesEcheverri, P & Skålén, P. (2011). Co-creation and co-destruction: A practice-theory based study of interactive value formation. Marketing Theory, 11(3). 351-373.spa
dc.relation.referencesEcheverri, P., & Skalén, P. (2011). Co-creation and co-destruction: A practice-theory based study of interactive value formation. Marketing Theory, 11(3), 351-373spa
dc.relation.referencesEdvardsson, B. Tronvoll, B. & Gruber, T (2011). Expanding understanding of service exchange and value cocreation: a social construction approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(2). 327-339.spa
dc.relation.referencesEdvardsson, B., Enquist, B., & Johnston, R. (2005). Co-creating customer value through hyperreality in the prepurchase service experience. Journal of Service Research, 8(2). 149–161.spa
dc.relation.referencesEdvardsson, B., Tronvoll, B., & Gruber, T. (2011). Expanding understanding of service exchange and value cocreation: a social construction approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1-13.spa
dc.relation.referencesErtimur, B., & Venkatesh, A. (2010). Opportunism in co-production: Implications for value co-creation. Australasian Marketing Journal, 18(4), 256-263.spa
dc.relation.referencesFehr, E. & Urs F.(2003). The Nature of Human Altruism. Nature, 425 (6960): 785–91.spa
dc.relation.referencesFenalco (2018). Informe del sector automotor en Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesFisk, R.S., Grove, L.C., Harris, D.A., Keeffe, K.L. Daunt (née Reynolds) & Wirtz, J. (2010). Customers behaving badly: A state of the art review, research agenda & implications for practitioners’ Journal of Services Marketing, 24(6), 417-429spa
dc.relation.referencesFreestone, O., & Mitchell, V.W. (2004). Generation Y attitudes towards e-ethics and internet-related misbehaviours. Journal of Business Ethics, 54, 121–128.spa
dc.relation.referencesFüller, J., & Matzler, K. (2007). Virtual product experience and customer participation—A chance for customercentred. really new products. Technovation, (27), 378-387.spa
dc.relation.referencesFüller, J., Bartl, M., Ernst, H., & Mühlbacher, H. (2006). Community based innovation: How to integrate members of virtual communities into new product development. Electronic Commerce Research, 6(2), 57–73spa
dc.relation.referencesFüller, J., Mühlbacher, H., Matzler, K., & Jawecki, G. (2010). Consumer empowerment through internet-based cocreation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(3). 71–102spa
dc.relation.referencesGebauer, J., Fuller, J., & Pezzei, R. (2013). The dark and thebright side of co-creation: Triggers of member behavior in online innovation communities. Journal of Business Research, 66, 1516–1527spa
dc.relation.referencesGentile, C., Spiller, N., & Noci, G. (2007). How to sustain the customer experience: An overview of experience components that co-create value with the customer. European. Management Journal, 25(5), 395-410.spa
dc.relation.referencesGrönroos, C. (2011). Value co-creation in service logic: A critical analysis. Marketing Theory, 11(3), 279-301.spa
dc.relation.referencesGrönroos, C., & Voima, P. (2013). Critical service logic: Making sense of value creation and co-creation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(2), 133-150spa
dc.relation.referencesGustafsson, A., Kristensson, P., & Witell, L. (2012). Customer co-creation in service innovation: A matter of communication. Journal of Service Management, 23(3), 311–27spa
dc.relation.referencesHamzelu, B., Gohary, A., Nia, S.G. & Heidarzadeh K.H., (2017). Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics. 29(2), 283-304spa
dc.relation.referencesHeidenreich, S., Wittkowski, K., Handrich, M., & Falk, T. (2014). The dark side of customer co-creation: exploring the consequences of failed co-created services. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1-18spa
dc.relation.referencesHeidenreich, S., Wittkowski, K., Handrich, M. & Falk, T. (2014). The dark side of customer co-creation: Exploring the consequences of failed co-created services. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(4), 279- 296spa
dc.relation.referencesHilton, T. (2008). Leveraging Operant resources of consumers: improving consumer experience or productivity? Marketing Review, 8(4), 359-366spa
dc.relation.referencesHomburg, C. & Kühnl, C. (2014) Is more always better? A comparative study of internal and external integration practices in new product and new service development. Journal of Business Research, 67(7), 1360-1367.spa
dc.relation.referencesHoyer, W.D., Chandy, R., Dorotic, M., Krafft, M., & Singh, S.S (2010). Consumer cocreation in new product development. Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 283 - 296spa
dc.relation.referencesInexmoda, (2018). Observatorio de Inexmoda. www.observatorioeconomico.inexmoda.org.cospa
dc.relation.referencesJärvi, H., Kähkönen, A.K., & Torvinen, H. (2018). When value co-creation fails: Reasons that lead to value codestruction. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 34(1), 63–77.spa
dc.relation.referencesKaplan, A., & Haenlein, M. (2018). Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence. Business Horizons, 62(1), 15–25. https://bdbib.javerianacali.edu.co:2421/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.004spa
dc.relation.referencesKeashly, L., & Neuman, J.H (2008). Workplace behavior project survey.spa
dc.relation.referencesKim, S., Haley, E., & Koo, G.Y. (2009). Comparison of the paths from consumer involvement types to ad responses between corporate advertising and product advertising. Journal of advertising, 38 (3) 67-80spa
dc.relation.referencesKlein., Jill, G, Craig, S.N., & & John, R. (2004). Why we boycott: Consumer motivation for boycott participation. Journal of Marketing, 68(July), 92-109spa
dc.relation.referencesKristensson, P., Matthing, J., & Johansson, N. (2008). Key strategies for the successful involvement of customers in the co-creation of new technology-based services. International Journal of Service Industry Management. 19(4), 474-491spa
dc.relation.referencesKwon, S., Ha, S. & Kowal, C. (2017). How online self-customization creates identification: Antecedents and consequences of consumer-customized product identification and the role of product involvement. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 1-13, ISSN 0747-5632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.051.spa
dc.relation.referencesLi, C., & Bernoff, J. (2008). Groundswell: Winning in a world transformed by social technologies. Boston, Harvard Business School Pressspa
dc.relation.referencesLindberg, F., & Mossberg, L. (2018). Competing orders of worth in extraordinary consumption community, Consumption Markets & Culture, 22(2), 109-130spa
dc.relation.referencesLindgreen, A., Hingley, M.K., Grant, D.B., & Morgan, R.E. (2012). Value in business and industrial marketing: Past, present, and future. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(1), 207-214spa
dc.relation.referencesMahr, D., Lievens, A. & Blazevic, V. (2014). The value of customer cocreated knowledge during the innovation process. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3)spa
dc.relation.referencesMaklan, S.K.S., & Ryals, L. (2008). New trends in innovation and customer relationship management – A challenge for market researchers. International Journal of Market Research, 50(2), 221-240spa
dc.relation.referencesMarín, L., Ruiz de Maya, S (2007). The identification of the consumer with the company: Beyond relationship marketing, Universia Business Review.spa
dc.relation.referencesO´connor, M., Dollinger, S., Kennedy, S., & Pelletier-Smetko. (1979). Prosocial behavior and psychopathology in emotionally disturbed boys. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 49(2), 301 – 310.spa
dc.relation.referencesO’Hern, M S., & Rindfleisch, A. (2009). Customer co-creation: A typology and research agenda. Review of Marketing Research, 6, 84-106spa
dc.relation.referencesO'Connor, M., Dollinger, S., Kennedy, S., & Pelletier-Smetko, P. (1979). Prosocial behavior and psychopathology in emotionally disturbed boys. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 49(2), 301-310.spa
dc.relation.referencesOrdanini, A., & Parasuraman, A. (2011). Service innovation viewed through a service dominant logic lens: A conceptual framework and empirical analysis. Journal of Service Research, 14(1), 3-23.spa
dc.relation.referencesPayne, A., Storbacka, K., & Frow, P. (2008). Managing the co-creation of value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 83-96spa
dc.relation.referencesPing, R. A (1996). Interaction and quadratic effect estimation: A two-step technique using structural equation analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 166-175spa
dc.relation.referencesPlé, L., & Cáceres, R.C. (2010). Not always co-creation: Introducing interactional co-destruction of value in service-dominant logic. Journal of Services Marketing, 24(6), 430-437.spa
dc.relation.referencesRamaswamy, V. (2011) It’s about human experiences… & beyond, to co-creation. Industrial Marketing Management, 40, 195-196spa
dc.relation.referencesRamaswamy, V. (2011) It’s about human experiences… & beyond, to co-creation. Industrial Marketing Management, 40, 195-196spa
dc.relation.referencesRamaswamy, V., & Gouillart, F. (2010). Building the co-creative enterprise. Harvard Business Review, 8(10), 100- 109spa
dc.relation.referencesRezaei Aghdam, A., Watson, J., Cliff, C., & Miah, S.J. (2020). Improving the theoretical understanding toward patient-driven health care innovation through online value cocreation: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(4), e16324.spa
dc.relation.referencesRobertson, N., Polonsky, M., & McQuilken, L. (2014). Are my symptoms serious Dr Google? A resource-based typology of value co-destruction in online self-diagnosis. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 22(3), 246–256. https://bdbib.javerianacali.edu.co:2421/10.1016/j.ausmj.2014.08.009spa
dc.relation.referencesRomero, D., & Molina, A. (2011). Collaborative Networked Organisations & Customer Communities: Value CoCreation & Co-Innovation in the Networking Era. Production Planning & Control. 22, 447-472. 10.1080/09537287.2010.536619spa
dc.relation.referencesRoser, C. (1990). Involvement, attention, & perceptions of message relevance in the response to persuasive appeals. Communication Research, 17, 571-600spa
dc.relation.referencesRui, J., & Kai, C. (2021) Impact of value cocreation on customer satisfaction and loyalty of online car-hailing services. Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research, 16(3).spa
dc.relation.referencesRushton, J.I, Chrisjohn, R.D., & Fekken, G.C (1981). The altruistic personality & the self-report altruism scale. Personality & Individual Differences, 2, 292-302.spa
dc.relation.referencesSawhney, M., Verona., & Prandelli, E. (2005). “Collaborating to create: The internet as a platform for customer engagement in product innovation,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19(4), 4–17spa
dc.relation.referencesSchaarschmidt, M., Walsh, G., & Evanschitzky, H. (2018). Customer interaction and innovation in hybrid offerings: Investigating moderation and mediation effects for goods and services innovation. Journal of Service Research, 21(1), 119-134.spa
dc.relation.referencesSeelig, B.J., & Rosof, L. (2001). Normal & pathological altruism. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 49(3), 933 – 959spa
dc.relation.referencesSeth, A., Song, K.P., & Pettit, R. (2000). Synergy, managerialism or hubris? An empirical examination of motives for foreign acquisitions of US firms, Journal of International Business Studies, 31, 387-405.spa
dc.relation.referencesSjódin, C., Kristensson, P. (2012). Customers experiences of co-creation during service innovation. International. Journal of Quality & Service Sciences, 4(2), 189-204spa
dc.relation.referencesSmith, A.M. (2013). The value co-destruction process: A customer resource perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 47(11/12), 1889–1909. https://bdbib.javerianacali.edu.co:2421/10.1108/EJM-08-2011-0420spa
dc.relation.referencesStokburger-Sauer, N. E., Scholl-Grissemann, U., Teichmann, K., Wetzels, M. (2016). Value cocreation at its peak: The asymmetric relationship between coproduction and loyalty. Journal of Service Management, 27(4), 563-590. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-10-2015-0305spa
dc.relation.referencesTram-Anh, N.P., Sweeney, J.C., Soutar, G.N. (2020). Customer effort in mandatory and voluntary value cocreation: A study in a health care context. Journal Of Services Marketingspa
dc.relation.referencesVargo, S.L. (2008). Customer integration and value creation: Paradigmatic traps and perspectives. Journal of Service Research, 11(2), 211-215spa
dc.relation.referencesVargo, S.L., & Lusch, R.F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1-17spa
dc.relation.referencesVargo, S.L., & Lusch, R.F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: Continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of marketing Science, 36(1), 1-10.spa
dc.relation.referencesVargo, S.L., & Lusch, R.F. (2011). It's all B2B…and beyond: Toward a systems perspective of the market Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), 181-187spa
dc.relation.referencesVargo, S.L., & Lusch, R.F (2006). Service-dominant logic: What it is, what it is not, what it might be.spa
dc.relation.referencesIn, Lusch, R.F., & Vargo, S.L. (Edsition). The service-dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate, & directions 43–56. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.spa
dc.relation.referencesVargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F., & Akaka, M.A. (2010). Advancing service science with service-dominant logic: Clarifications and Conceptual Development. In P. P. Maglio, C. A. Kieliszewski & J. C. Spohrer (Eds.), Handbook of service science, 133-156spa
dc.relation.referencesVargo, S.L., Maglio, P.P., & Akaka, M.A. (2008). On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective. European Management Journal, 26(3), 145-152spa
dc.relation.referencesVaughn, R. (1980). How advertising works: A planning model. Journal of Advertising Research, 20, 27-30.spa
dc.relation.referencesVaughn, R. (1986). How advertising works: a planning model revisited. Journal of Advertising Research, 26, 57- 65.spa
dc.relation.referencesVon Hippel, E., Katz, R. (2002). Shifting innovation to users via toolkits. Management Sci, 48(7),821–833.spa
dc.relation.referencesWirtz, J., & McColl-Kennedy, J.R. (2010). Opportunistic customer claiming during service recovery. Journal of Retailing, 38, 654-675.spa
dc.relation.referencesWirtz, J., & Kum, D. (2004). Consumer cheating on service guarantees. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(2), 159-175spa
dc.relation.referencesYe, Hua (Jonathan), Kankanhalli, A. (2020) Value cocreation for service innovation: Examining the relationships between Service Innovativeness, customer participation, and mobile app performance. Journal Of The Association For Information Systems, 21(2), 292-311.spa
dc.relation.referencesZaichkowsky, J.L. (1985). Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), 341-352spa
dc.relation.referencesZhang, T., Lu, C., Torres, E., & Chen, P.J. (2018). Engaging customers in value co-creation or co-destruction online. Journal of Services Marketing, 32(1), 57–69.spa
dc.contributor.cvlacCastro Aristizábal, Geovanny [0000530735]spa
dc.contributor.cvlacSalas Paramo Jairo [0000285145]spa
dc.contributor.cvlacEscandón Barbosa Diana [0000653969]spa
dc.contributor.googlescholarCastro Aristizábal, Geovanny [es&oi=ao]spa
dc.contributor.googlescholarSalas Paramo Jairo [es&oi=ao]spa
dc.contributor.googlescholarEscandón Barbosa Diana [es&oi=ao]spa
dc.contributor.orcidCastro Aristizábal, Geovanny [0000-0002-3567-983X]spa
dc.contributor.orcidSalas Paramo Jairo [0000-0002-1798-9711]spa
dc.contributor.orcidEscandón Barbosa Diana [0000-0002-1486-5908]spa
dc.contributor.researchgateCastro Aristizábal, Geovanny [Geovanny-Castro-Aristizabal]spa
dc.contributor.researchgateSalas Paramo Jairo [Jairo-Salas-Paramo]spa
dc.contributor.researchgateEscandón Barbosa Diana [Diana-Escandon-Barbosa-2211670557]spa
dc.subject.lembAdministración de empresasspa
dc.subject.lembCrecimiento empresarialspa
dc.subject.lembMercadeospa
dc.subject.lembEncuestasspa
dc.subject.lembValor agregadospa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.unab.edu.cospa
dc.description.abstractenglishPurpose: The purpose of this research is to identify the saturation effects of the consumer company identification, involvement and value co-creation in the fashion and car industry in Colombia. Design/methodology/approach: It has been defined to use the method of quadratic structural equations allowing analyzing the behavior of variables in a non-linear way, maintaining the advantages of structural equation models. To reach the objective has been collected a survey of 400 consumers from the Fashion and Automotive sectors in Colombia who have participated in value co-creation processes has been carried out. Findings: The results show that consumer involvement has a maximum level of influence on consumer company identification, from which the benefits begin to decrease for both the fashion and automotive sectors. In the case of the value co-creation, it also shows that it has a maximum level in which its implementation has benefits on the consumer company identification. Research limitations/implications: Within the limitations, it can be found that the information used describes particularities of a country considered in the process of development where its cultural characteristics can affect the perceptions of consumers. Practical implications: Most companies generate strategies that allow them to improve relationships with their consumers through collaborative processes that allow them to add value to their processes and products. However, such strategies have decreasing behaviors over time that generate less benefit both in their performance and in their relationships with their clients. In this way, companies will have evidence of the need to establish temporary plans in which a strategy will generate greater benefits. Social implications: The results of the research allow us to understand the individual and social characteristics that are fundamental for the implementation of strategies aimed at including the consumer in the design processes to create value for the company. Originality/value: Most of the literature in the field of the Service dominant logic has focused on empirical studies that show the benefits of the implementation of value co-creation. However, it is possible to find studies in which the possibility of finding results in processes of value cocreation unsatisfactory for both companies and for the consumer is considered. It is precisely in the negative results that the present study has defined as the main purpose of the research.spa
dc.subject.proposalConsumidor identificación de la empresaspa
dc.subject.proposalCocreación de Valorspa
dc.subject.proposalParticipación del consumidorspa
dc.subject.proposalEcuación del modelo estructural cuadráticospa
dc.subject.proposalCo-destrucciónspa
dc.subject.proposalEfectos de saturaciónspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.rights.creativecommonsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia*
dc.contributor.researchgroupGrupo de Investigación en Dinámicas Sectorialesspa
dc.contributor.linkedinCastro Aristizábal, Geovanny [geovanny-castro-aristizabal-21589968]


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia