Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Factores asociados al arrepentimiento después de la realización de esterilización quirúrgica en mujeres que asisten a la consulta en el Instituto de Salud de Bucaramanga (ISABU) y la Clínica Girón

dc.contributor.advisorMantilla, Amanda
dc.contributor.advisorNavarro, Margarita
dc.contributor.advisorCastellanos Domínguez, Yeny Zulay
dc.contributor.authorConde Angarita, Marianelly
dc.coverage.spatialBucaramanga (Santander, Colombia)spa
dc.coverage.spatialGirón (Santander, Colombia)spa
dc.coverage.temporal2018-2020spa
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-10T20:38:04Z
dc.date.available2021-08-10T20:38:04Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/13734
dc.description.abstractIntroducción: La tasa de arrepentimiento de la esterilización quirúrgica a nivel mundial se encuentra alrededor del 14,3% y es casi 4 veces mayor en las mujeres jóvenes. En Colombia, la esterilización quirúrgica femenina es el método anticonceptivo más usado (34,9%) según la Encuesta de Salud y demografía. Objetivo: Conocer los factores asociados al arrepentimiento autoinformado después de la esterilización quirúrgica en mujeres usuarias de servicio de salud de primer nivel. Metodología: Estudio de corte transversal realizado en 512 participantes con antecedente de esterilización quirúrgica mayor a un año. Se evaluaron variables sociodemográficas, consejería en planificación familiar, factores asociados a la realización de esterilización quirúrgica y presencia o no de arrepentimiento. Los datos se tabularon en Microsoft Excel y fueron analizados con STATA 14.0. Se realizó análisis por regresión logística para proponer un modelo multivariado. Resultados: 512 mujeres entre 18-50 años participaron entre julio de 2018 y marzo de 2020. La frecuencia de arrepentimiento fue del 12,5%, algunas de las variables asociadas a este fueron la edad actual y al momento de la cirugía, tener pareja estable y haber sido influenciada por alguien para realizarse la cirugía (p<0,05). En Introducción: La tasa de arrepentimiento de la esterilización quirúrgica a nivel mundial se encuentra alrededor del 14,3% y es casi 4 veces mayor en las mujeres jóvenes. Conclusión: En este estudio se encontraron factores protectores y de riesgo que pueden usarse como herramientas claves al momento de brindar la asesoría en planificación familiar.spa
dc.description.tableofcontentsResumen Introducción 7 1. Planteamiento del problema 8 2. Justificación 12 3. Marco teórico 13 4. Estado del arte 27 5. Objetivo general 33 5.1. Objetivos específicos 33 6. Metodología 33 6.1. Pregunta de investigación 33 6.2. Diseño 33 6.3. Población 33 6.4. Tamaño de muestra 33 6.5. Criterios de selección 34 7. Procedimiento 35 8. Plan de análisis 36 9. Tabla de operacionalización de variables 37 10. Disposiciones éticas 40 11. Resultados esperados 41 12.Impacto esperado 42 13. Resultados 42 13.1. Análisis univariado 42 13.2. Análisis bivariado 49 13.3. Análisis multivariado 51 14. Discusión 51 14.1. Fortalezas y limitaciones 57 15. Conclusiones 58 16. Bibliografía 59spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/*
dc.titleFactores asociados al arrepentimiento después de la realización de esterilización quirúrgica en mujeres que asisten a la consulta en el Instituto de Salud de Bucaramanga (ISABU) y la Clínica Girónspa
dc.title.translatedFactors associated with regret after undergoing surgical sterilization in women who attend the consultation at the Bucaramanga Health Institute (ISABU) and the Girón clinicspa
dc.degree.nameEspecialista en Ginecología y Obstetriciaspa
dc.publisher.grantorUniversidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNABspa
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad Ciencias de la Saludspa
dc.publisher.programEspecialización en Ginecología y Obstetriciaspa
dc.description.degreelevelEspecializaciónspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.localTesisspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.subject.keywordsGynecologyspa
dc.subject.keywordsObstetricsspa
dc.subject.keywordsMedical sciencesspa
dc.subject.keywordsHealth sciencesspa
dc.subject.keywordsSurgical sterilizationspa
dc.subject.keywordsRepentancespa
dc.subject.keywordsRisk factor'sspa
dc.subject.keywordsCounselingspa
dc.subject.keywordsRecanalization surgeryspa
dc.subject.keywordsMedical practicespa
dc.subject.keywordsWomen's health servicesspa
dc.subject.keywordsFemale sterilityspa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNABspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional UNABspa
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.relation.referencesACOG. Sterilization of Women: Ethical Issues and Considerations Committee on Ethics. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(371):775.spa
dc.relation.referencesProfamilia, Minsalud. Encuesta Nacional de Demografía y Salud . Tomo 2 [Internet]. 2015. Recuperado de: http://www.profamilia.org.co/docs/TOMO II.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesLudermir AB, Machado KM de M, Costa AM da, Alves SV, Araújo TVB de. Tubal ligation regret and related risk factors: findings from a case-control study in Pernambuco State, Brazil. Cad Saude Publica [Internet]. 2009;25(6):1361–8. Recuperado de: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102- 311X2009000600018&lng=en&tlng=enspa
dc.relation.referencesSchmidt JE, Hillis SD, Marchbanks PA, Jeng G, Peterson HB. Requesting information about and obtaining reversal after tubal sterilization: Findings from the U.S. collaborative review of sterilization. Fertil Steril. 2000;74(5):892–8spa
dc.relation.referencesWorld Health Organization Department of Reproductive Health and Research (WHO/RHR) and Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health/Center for Communication Programs (CCP), Knowledge for Health Project. Family Planning: A Global Handbook for Providers (2018 update). Baltimore and Geneva: CCP and WHO, 2018.spa
dc.relation.referencesJadhav A, Vala-Haynes E. Informed Choice and Female Sterilization in South Asia and Latin America. J Biosoc Sci [Internet]. 2018;1–17. Recuperado de: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0021932017000621/type/ journal_articlespa
dc.relation.referencesKoteshwar S, Siddesh A. A study of tubal recanalization in Era of ART (Assisted reproduction technology). J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2016;10(2):QC01–3.spa
dc.relation.referencesWHO. Ensuring human rights in the provision of contraceptive information and services. 2014.spa
dc.relation.referencesBlack A, Co-chair OON. Canadian Contraception Consensus. 2015;2015(329).spa
dc.relation.referencesACOG. P RACTICE BULLET IN Benefits and Risks of Sterilization. 2013;121(2):392–404spa
dc.relation.referencesRoyal College od Obstetricians & Gynaecologist. Female Sterilisation. 2016;(3).spa
dc.relation.referencesWorld Health Organization. Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use. Baltimore and Geneva: CCP and WHO. 2015spa
dc.relation.referencesKavanaugh ML, Jerman J. Contraceptive method use in the United States: trends and characteristics between 2008, 2012 and 2014. Contraception 2018; 97:14.spa
dc.relation.referencesKavanaugh ML, Jerman J. Contraceptive method use in the United States: trends and characteristics between 2008, 2012 and 2014. Contraception 2018; 97:14. endoscopicas Progresos en Ginecol y Obstet. 2015;58(1)spa
dc.relation.referencesGizzo S, Bertocco A, Saccardi C, Di Gangi S, Litta PS, D’Antona D, et al. Female sterilization: Update on clinical efficacy, side effects and contraindications. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2014;23(5):261–70spa
dc.relation.referencesBeerthuizen R. State-of-the-art of non-hormonal methods of contraception: V. Female sterilisation. Eur J Contracept Reprod Heal Care [Internet]. 2010;15(2):124–35. Recuperado de: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=reference&D=emed9&NE WS=N&AN=2010176700spa
dc.relation.referencesPeterson HB. Sterilization. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 111:189.spa
dc.relation.referencesPeterson HB, Xia Z, Hughes JM, Wilcox LS, Tylor LR, Trussell J, et al. The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization : Findings from the U . S . Collaborative Review of Sterilization. 1996;1161–70.spa
dc.relation.referencesDehlendorf C. Contraceptive Counseling : Best Practices to Ensure Quality Communication and Enable Effective Contraceptive Use. 2014;57(4):659– 73.spa
dc.relation.referencesBertrand JT, Ward VM. Family Planning inColombia. The Achievements of 50 Years. 2015;(April).spa
dc.relation.referencesBertrand JT, Ward VM. Family Planning inColombia. The Achievements of 50 Years. 2015;(April).spa
dc.relation.referencesCorte Constritucional de Colombia. Sentencia C-131/14. 2014spa
dc.relation.referencesDivers W A: Characteristics of women requesting reversal of sterilization. Fertil Steril 41:233, 1984spa
dc.relation.referencesMoseman CP, Robinson RD, Bates GW, Propst AM. Identifying women who will request sterilization reversal in a military population. Contraception. 2006;73(5):512–5.spa
dc.relation.referencesAnnis DS, Mosher DF, Roberts DD. Surgical Sterilization, Regret, and Race: Contemporary Patterns. Vol. 27. 2009. 339–351 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesVerkuyl DAA. FIGO’s ethical recommendations on female sterilisation will do more harm than good: A commentary. J Med Ethics. 2015;41(6):478–87spa
dc.relation.referencesGrubb GS, Peterson HB, Layde PM, Rubin GL. Regret after decision to have a tubal sterilization. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 1985;44(2):248–53. Recuperado de: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)48746-7spa
dc.relation.referencesWilcox LS, Chu SY, Eaker ED, Zeger SL, Peterson HB. Risk factors for regret after tubal sterilization: 5years of follow-up in a prospective study**The Collaborative Review of Sterilization was supported in part by an interagency agreement between the Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia, and by gr. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 1991;55(5):927–33. Recuperado de: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0015028216543015spa
dc.relation.referencesPlatz-Christensen JJ, Tronstad SE, Johansson O, Carlsson SÅ. Evaluation of regret after tubal sterilization. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1992;38(3):223–6.spa
dc.relation.referencesHardy E, Bahamondes L, Osis MJ, Costa RG. Risk Factors for Tubal Sterilization. Contraception. 1996;7824(96).spa
dc.relation.referencesMelo KM, Machado DM. Changes in family structure and regret following tubal sterilization Mudanças na estrutura familiar e arrependimento da laqueadura tubária. 2005;21(6):1768–77.spa
dc.relation.referencesKelekçi S, Erdemoglu E, Kutluk S, Ylmaz B, Savan K. Risk factors for tubal ligation: Regret and psychological effects - Impact of Beck Depression Inventory. Contraception. 2005;71(6):417–20.spa
dc.relation.referencesCurtis KM, Mohllajee AP, Peterson HB. Regret following female sterilization at a young age: A systematic review. Contraception. 2006;73(2):205–10.spa
dc.relation.referencesFernandes AM dos S, Bedone AJ, Leme LCP, Yamada EM. Laqueadura intraparto e de intervaloipt. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2006;52:323–7. Availablespa
dc.relation.referencesSingh A, Ogollah R, Ram F, Pallikadavath S. Sterilization regret among married women in India: Implications for the indian national family planning program. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012;38(4):187–95.spa
dc.relation.referencesBoufettal H, Mahdaoui S, Samouh N. Facteurs d??terminants le regret apris ligature tubaire. Pan Afr Med J. 2014;17:244spa
dc.relation.referencesBecner A, Becic A. Regret following female sterilization in Slovenia. Int J Gynecol Obstet [Internet]. 2015;131(20090701):S56–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.03.018spa
dc.relation.referencesShreffler K, Greil A, McQuillan J. Reasons for tubal sterilisation, regret and depressive symptoms. 2016;8(5):444–54.spa
dc.relation.referencesBansal A, Dwivedi LK. Sterilization regret in India: Is quality of care a matter of concern? Contracept Reprod Med. 2020;5(1):1–12.spa
dc.relation.referencesPal G, Chaurasia H. Revisiting Post-Sterilization Regret in India. J Obstet Gynecol India [Internet]. 2020;70(4):295–303. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-020-01309-5spa
dc.contributor.cvlacCastellanos Domínguez, Yeny Zulay [0001363740]spa
dc.contributor.researchgateCastellanos Domínguez, Yeny Zulay [Yeny-Castellanos-2]spa
dc.subject.lembGinecologíaspa
dc.subject.lembObstetriciaspa
dc.subject.lembCiencias médicasspa
dc.subject.lembPráctica médicaspa
dc.subject.lembServicios de salud para mujeresspa
dc.subject.lembEsterilidad femeninaspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.unab.edu.cospa
dc.description.abstractenglishIntroduction: The regret rate for surgical sterilization worldwide is around 14.3% and is almost 4 times higher in young women. In Colombia, female surgical sterilization is the most widely used contraceptive method (34.9%) according to the Health and Demographic Survey. Objective: To know the factors associated with self-reported regret after surgical sterilization in women users of first-level health services. Methodology: Cross-sectional study carried out in 512 participants with a history of surgical sterilization greater than one year. Sociodemographic variables, family planning counseling, factors associated with performance of surgical sterilization and presence or absence of regret. The data were tabulated in Microsoft Excel and analyzed with STATA 14.0. Logistic regression analysis was performed to propose a multivariate model. Results: 512 women between 18-50 years old participated between July 2018 and March 2020. The frequency of regret was 12.5%, some of the variables associated with this were current age and at the time of surgery, having a partner stable and having been influenced by someone to perform the surgery (p <0.05). In Introduction: The regret rate for surgical sterilization worldwide is around 14.3% and is almost 4 times higher in young women. Conclusion: In this study, protective and risk factors were found that can be used as key tools when providing counseling in family planning.spa
dc.subject.proposalCiencias de la saludspa
dc.subject.proposalEsterilización quirúrgicaspa
dc.subject.proposalArrepentimientospa
dc.subject.proposalFactores de riesgospa
dc.subject.proposalConsejeríaspa
dc.subject.proposalCirugía de recanalizaciónspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM
dc.rights.creativecommonsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia*
dc.coverage.campusUNAB Campus Bucaramangaspa
dc.description.learningmodalityModalidad Presencialspa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre:
2021_Tesis_Marianelly_Conde pdf.pdf
Tamaño:
587.6Kb
Formato:
PDF
Descripción:
Tesis
Ver/
Thumbnail
Nombre:
2021_Licencia_Marianelly_Conde.pdf
Tamaño:
220.3Kb
Formato:
PDF
Descripción:
Licencia
Ver/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia