Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorValenzuela Gruesso, Pedrospa
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-27T15:13:27Z
dc.date.available2020-10-27T15:13:27Z
dc.date.issued2001-07-08
dc.identifier.issn2590-8669|0124-0781
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/11054
dc.description.abstractDurante las últimas décadas se han multiplicado las críticas a la violencia y las propuestas alternativas para controlarla o erradicarla de manera definitiva. Desde diferentes perspectivas y con una variada gama de argumentos, la violencia ha sido rechazada como un fenómeno esencialmente inmoral que promueve valores militaristas y prácticas autoritarias, o por sus elevados costos en términos materiales y de vidas humanas, sus consecuencias negativas para el medio ambiente y su ineficacia como instrumento para la consecución de objetivos sociales y políticos. Las alternativas propuestas pueden clasificarse en tres grandes categorías, según que enfatizen el control de los instrumentos de guerra (Pacifismo Instrumental), el diseño de instituciones para la regulación de las relaciones entre colectividades tanto en el orden como en el interno (Pacifismo Institucional) o la transformación de valores con el fin de posibilitar la coexistencia y la tramitación pacífica de los conflictos (Pacifismo Finalista)spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUNAB
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/reflexion/article/view/842/809
dc.relation.urihttps://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/reflexion/article/view/842
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.sourceReflexión Política; Vol. 3 No. 5 (2001): Reflexión Política
dc.subjectInvestigaciones
dc.titleLa no violencia como método de luchaspa
dc.title.translatedNon-violence as a method of struggleeng
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad Ciencias Jurídicas y Políticasspa
dc.publisher.programPregrado Derecho
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.localArtículospa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.subject.keywordsLegal and Political Scienceseng
dc.subject.keywordsLaweng
dc.subject.keywordsInvestigationseng
dc.subject.keywordsLegislationeng
dc.subject.keywordsViolenceeng
dc.subject.keywordsFighting methodeng
dc.subject.keywordsEthical violenceeng
dc.subject.keywordsPragmatic violenceeng
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNABspa
dc.type.hasversionInfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.relation.referencesACKERMAN, Peter & Christopher Kruegler (1994). Strategic Nonviolent Conflict:The Dynamics of People Power in the Twentieth Century, Londres, Praeger
dc.relation.referencesBOND, Douglas (1988). “The Nature and Meaning of Nonviolent Direct Action: AnExploratory Study”, en Journal of Peace Research, vol. 25, no. 1
dc.relation.references_ (1992). “Research Issues and Explanatory Frameworks”, en Center forInternational Affairs, Harvard University, Transforming Struggle. Strategy and theGlobal Experience of Nonviolent Direct Action
dc.relation.referencesBONDURANT, Joan (1959). Conquest of Violence: The Gandhian Philosophy ofConflict, Bombay, Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesBOSERUP, Anders & Andrew Mack (1975). War Without Weapons: Non-Violence inNational Defense, New York; Schocken Books
dc.relation.referencesBURROWES, Robert (1996). The Strategy of Nonviolent Defense: A GandhianApproach, Albany, State University of New York Press.
dc.relation.referencesBRUYN, Severyn and Paula Rayman (1979). “Introduction”, en Bruyn and Rayman,eds., Nonviolent Action and social Change, New York, Irvington Publishers, Inc
dc.relation.referencesBRUYN, Severyn (1979). “Social Theory of Nonviolent Action”, en Bruyn andRayman, eds., Nonviolent Action and social Change, New York, Irvington Publishers,Inc
dc.relation.referencesFISHER, Margaret (1971). “Contrasting Approaches to Conflict”, en Bondurant,Joan, ed., con Margaret Fisher, Conflict: Violence and Nonviolence, Chicago/NewYork, Aldine-Atherton
dc.relation.referencesLeaky, George (1979). “Sociological Mechanisms of Nonviolence: How it Works”, inBruyn and Rayman, eds., Nonviolent Action and social Change, New York, IrvingtonPublishers, Inc
dc.relation.references(1973). Strategy for a Living Revolution, San Francisco, Freeman & Company
dc.relation.referencesMCCARTHY, Ronald (1992). “Nonviolent Action: Notes on the Technique Approach”,en Center for International Affairs, Harvard University, Transforming Struggle.Strategy and the Global Experience of Nonviolent Direct Action
dc.relation.referencesSHARP, Gene (1999). “Beyond Just War and Pacifism: Nonviolent Struggle towardsJustice, Freedom, and Peace”, en Steger, Manfred and Nancy Lind, eds., Violenceand its Alternatives: An Interdisciplinary Reader, London, MacMillan
dc.relation.references(1973). The Politics of Nonviolent Action, Boston, Porte Sargent Publishers
dc.relation.references(1971). “The Technique of Nonviolent Action”, en Bondurant, Joan, ed., conMargaret Fisher, Conflict: Violence and Nonviolence, Chicago/New York, Aldine-Atherton
dc.relation.referencesZUNES, Stephen (1994). “Unarmed Insurrections Against AuthoritarianGovernments in the Third World: a New Kind of Revolution,” en Third Word Quarterly,vol. 15, no. 3
dc.subject.lembDerechospa
dc.subject.lembCiencias jurídicas y políticasspa
dc.subject.lembLegislaciónspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.unab.edu.co
dc.description.abstractenglishDuring the last decades, criticisms of violence and alternative proposals to control or eradicate it definitively have multiplied. From different perspectives and with a wide range of arguments, violence has been rejected as an essentially immoral phenomenon that promotes militaristic values ​​and authoritarian practices, or because of its high costs in material terms and human lives, its negative consequences for the environment and its ineffectiveness as an instrument for achieving social and political objectives. The proposed alternatives can be classified into three broad categories, depending on whether they emphasize the control of the instruments of war (Instrumental Pacifism), the design of institutions for the regulation of relations between collectivities both in the order and internally (Institutional Pacifism) or the transformation of values ​​in order to enable coexistence and the peaceful processing of conflicts (Finalist Pacifism)eng
dc.subject.proposalViolenciaspa
dc.subject.proposalMétodo de luchaspa
dc.subject.proposalViolencia éticaspa
dc.subject.proposalViolencia pragmáticaspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/CJournalArticle
dc.publisher.deparmentInstituto de Estudios Políticos IEPspa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/