dc.contributor.author | Valenzuela Gruesso, Pedro | spa |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-10-27T15:13:27Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-10-27T15:13:27Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2001-07-08 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2590-8669|0124-0781 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/11054 | |
dc.description.abstract | Durante las últimas décadas se han multiplicado las críticas a la violencia y las propuestas alternativas para controlarla o erradicarla de manera definitiva. Desde diferentes perspectivas y con una variada gama de argumentos, la violencia ha sido rechazada como un fenómeno esencialmente inmoral que promueve valores militaristas y prácticas autoritarias, o por sus elevados costos en términos materiales y de vidas humanas, sus consecuencias negativas para el medio ambiente y su ineficacia como instrumento para la consecución de objetivos sociales y políticos. Las alternativas propuestas pueden clasificarse en tres grandes categorías, según que enfatizen el control de los instrumentos de guerra (Pacifismo Instrumental), el diseño de instituciones para la regulación de las relaciones entre colectividades tanto en el orden como en el interno (Pacifismo Institucional) o la transformación de valores con el fin de posibilitar la coexistencia y la tramitación pacífica de los conflictos (Pacifismo Finalista) | spa |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | spa |
dc.language.iso | spa | spa |
dc.publisher | UNAB | |
dc.relation | https://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/reflexion/article/view/842/809 | |
dc.relation.uri | https://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/reflexion/article/view/842 | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/ | |
dc.source | Reflexión Política; Vol. 3 No. 5 (2001): Reflexión Política | |
dc.subject | Investigaciones | |
dc.title | La no violencia como método de lucha | spa |
dc.title.translated | Non-violence as a method of struggle | eng |
dc.publisher.faculty | Facultad Ciencias Jurídicas y Políticas | spa |
dc.publisher.program | Pregrado Derecho | |
dc.type.driver | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
dc.type.local | Artículo | spa |
dc.type.coar | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f | |
dc.subject.keywords | Legal and Political Sciences | eng |
dc.subject.keywords | Law | eng |
dc.subject.keywords | Investigations | eng |
dc.subject.keywords | Legislation | eng |
dc.subject.keywords | Violence | eng |
dc.subject.keywords | Fighting method | eng |
dc.subject.keywords | Ethical violence | eng |
dc.subject.keywords | Pragmatic violence | eng |
dc.identifier.instname | instname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNAB | spa |
dc.type.hasversion | Info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | |
dc.type.hasversion | info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion | |
dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | spa |
dc.relation.references | ACKERMAN, Peter & Christopher Kruegler (1994). Strategic Nonviolent Conflict:The Dynamics of People Power in the Twentieth Century, Londres, Praeger | |
dc.relation.references | BOND, Douglas (1988). “The Nature and Meaning of Nonviolent Direct Action: AnExploratory Study”, en Journal of Peace Research, vol. 25, no. 1 | |
dc.relation.references | _ (1992). “Research Issues and Explanatory Frameworks”, en Center forInternational Affairs, Harvard University, Transforming Struggle. Strategy and theGlobal Experience of Nonviolent Direct Action | |
dc.relation.references | BONDURANT, Joan (1959). Conquest of Violence: The Gandhian Philosophy ofConflict, Bombay, Oxford University Press. | |
dc.relation.references | BOSERUP, Anders & Andrew Mack (1975). War Without Weapons: Non-Violence inNational Defense, New York; Schocken Books | |
dc.relation.references | BURROWES, Robert (1996). The Strategy of Nonviolent Defense: A GandhianApproach, Albany, State University of New York Press. | |
dc.relation.references | BRUYN, Severyn and Paula Rayman (1979). “Introduction”, en Bruyn and Rayman,eds., Nonviolent Action and social Change, New York, Irvington Publishers, Inc | |
dc.relation.references | BRUYN, Severyn (1979). “Social Theory of Nonviolent Action”, en Bruyn andRayman, eds., Nonviolent Action and social Change, New York, Irvington Publishers,Inc | |
dc.relation.references | FISHER, Margaret (1971). “Contrasting Approaches to Conflict”, en Bondurant,Joan, ed., con Margaret Fisher, Conflict: Violence and Nonviolence, Chicago/NewYork, Aldine-Atherton | |
dc.relation.references | Leaky, George (1979). “Sociological Mechanisms of Nonviolence: How it Works”, inBruyn and Rayman, eds., Nonviolent Action and social Change, New York, IrvingtonPublishers, Inc | |
dc.relation.references | (1973). Strategy for a Living Revolution, San Francisco, Freeman & Company | |
dc.relation.references | MCCARTHY, Ronald (1992). “Nonviolent Action: Notes on the Technique Approach”,en Center for International Affairs, Harvard University, Transforming Struggle.Strategy and the Global Experience of Nonviolent Direct Action | |
dc.relation.references | SHARP, Gene (1999). “Beyond Just War and Pacifism: Nonviolent Struggle towardsJustice, Freedom, and Peace”, en Steger, Manfred and Nancy Lind, eds., Violenceand its Alternatives: An Interdisciplinary Reader, London, MacMillan | |
dc.relation.references | (1973). The Politics of Nonviolent Action, Boston, Porte Sargent Publishers | |
dc.relation.references | (1971). “The Technique of Nonviolent Action”, en Bondurant, Joan, ed., conMargaret Fisher, Conflict: Violence and Nonviolence, Chicago/New York, Aldine-Atherton | |
dc.relation.references | ZUNES, Stephen (1994). “Unarmed Insurrections Against AuthoritarianGovernments in the Third World: a New Kind of Revolution,” en Third Word Quarterly,vol. 15, no. 3 | |
dc.subject.lemb | Derecho | spa |
dc.subject.lemb | Ciencias jurídicas y políticas | spa |
dc.subject.lemb | Legislación | spa |
dc.identifier.repourl | repourl:https://repository.unab.edu.co | |
dc.description.abstractenglish | During the last decades, criticisms of violence and alternative proposals to control or eradicate it definitively have multiplied. From different perspectives and with a wide range of arguments, violence has been rejected as an essentially immoral phenomenon that promotes militaristic values and authoritarian practices, or because of its high costs in material terms and human lives, its negative consequences for the environment and its ineffectiveness as an instrument for achieving social and political objectives. The proposed alternatives can be classified into three broad categories, depending on whether they emphasize the control of the instruments of war (Instrumental Pacifism), the design of institutions for the regulation of relations between collectivities both in the order and internally (Institutional Pacifism) or the transformation of values in order to enable coexistence and the peaceful processing of conflicts (Finalist Pacifism) | eng |
dc.subject.proposal | Violencia | spa |
dc.subject.proposal | Método de lucha | spa |
dc.subject.proposal | Violencia ética | spa |
dc.subject.proposal | Violencia pragmática | spa |
dc.type.redcol | http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/CJournalArticle | |
dc.publisher.deparment | Instituto de Estudios Políticos IEP | spa |