Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSánchez Cabarcas, Fabiospa
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-27T15:12:58Z
dc.date.available2020-10-27T15:12:58Z
dc.date.issued2011-10-21
dc.identifier.issn2590-8669|0124-0781
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/10969
dc.description.abstractEl fin de la Guerra Fría ocasionó cambios en la política exterior estadounidense hacia Irak. Las Administraciones de G.H. Bush (1989-1993) y Bill Clinton (1993-2001) adoptaron diferentes estrategias con el propósito de controlar al régimen de Saddam Hussein. Acudieron al multilateralismo para establecer sanciones económicas, zonas de exclusión aéreas y programas de inspección y control de armas, también utilizaron la fuerza militar cuando fue necesario. No obstante, procuraron mantener un equilibrio de poder regional favorable a los intereses de Washington, que luego sería abandonado en la era neoconservadora de G.W. Bush.spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUNAB
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/reflexion/article/view/1576/1479
dc.relation.urihttps://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/reflexion/article/view/1576
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.sourceReflexión Política; Vol. 13 No. 26 (2011): Reflexión Política (julio a diciembre)
dc.subjectEE UU
dc.subjectIrak
dc.subjectOriente Medio
dc.subjectUNMOVIC
dc.subjectUNSCOM
dc.titleLa política exterior de EE. UU. hacia Irak en la posguerra fría
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.localArtículospa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.subject.keywordsUSAeng
dc.subject.keywordsIraqeng
dc.subject.keywordsMiddle Easteng
dc.subject.keywordsUNMOVICeng
dc.subject.keywordsUNSCOMeng
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNABspa
dc.type.hasversionInfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.relation.referencesÅkermark, S. S. (2005). Storms, Foxes, and Nebulous Legal Arguments: Twelve Years of Force against Iraq, 1991–2003. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 54(01), 221-235.eng
dc.relation.referencesAli, M., Blacker, J., & Jones, G. (2003). Annual Mortality Rates and Excess Deaths of Children under Five in Iraq, 1991-98. Population Studies, 57(2), 217-226.eng
dc.relation.referencesArkin, W. M. R. (1999). The Difference Was in the Details. Iraqi President Saddam Hussein in an address Dec. 20 http://www.washingtonpost.com/ wp-srv/inatl/longterm/iraq/analysis.htm Washington Post - Page B1eng
dc.relation.referencesAspin, L. (1993). The Bottom-Up Review: Forces For a New Eraeng
dc.relation.referencesBaker, J. (1995). Politics of Diplomacy; Revolution, War and Peace, 1989 - 1992. New York: Putnam.eng
dc.relation.referencesByman, D. (2000). After the storm: US policy towardIraqsince1991.PoliticalScience Quarterly, 115(4), 493-516eng
dc.relation.referencesCameron, F. (2005). US Foreign Policy After the Cold War: Global Hegemon Or Reluctant Sheriff? London: Routledge.eng
dc.relation.referencesCNN.(1995).Interview transcript with Hussein Kamel. In Sadler, B. (Ed.).eng
dc.relation.references(1998). Annan, Iraq sign weapons-inspection deal: http://edition.cnn.com /WORLD/9802/23/iraq.deal.update.4am/index.html.eng
dc.relation.referencesCordesman, A. H., & Hashim, A. (1997). Iraq: Sanctions and beyond. Boulder,Colorado: Westview Press.eng
dc.relation.referencesCox, M. (1995). U.S. Foreign Policy After the Cold War. Superpower Without a Mission London:Pinter, The Royal Institute of International Affairs.eng
dc.relation.referencesDamrosch, L.F.(2000).The Clinton Administration and War Powers. Law and Contemporary Problems, 63(1/2), 125-141.eng
dc.relation.referencesDrezner, D. W. (1999). The Sanctions Paradox: Economic Statecraft and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.eng
dc.relation.referencesGergen, D. (2000). Eyewitness to Power. New York: Simon and Schuster.eng
dc.relation.referencesGilpin, R. (1981). War and Change in World Politics.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.eng
dc.relation.referencesGray, C. (2002). From Unity to Polarization: International Law and the Use of Force Against Iraq. European Journal of International Law, 13(1), 1.eng
dc.relation.referencesHsieh, C. T., & Moretti, E. (2006). Did Iraq Cheat the United Nations? Underpricing, Bribes, and the Oil for Food Program*. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(4), 1211-1248eng
dc.relation.referencesIzquierdo Brichs, F. (2005). Guerra y agua. Conflicto político y carestía de agua en Palestina. Santiago de Compostela: Fundación Araguaney.spa
dc.relation.references(2011).Breve Introducción al Conflicto Palestino-Israelí. Madrid: Los libros de la Catarata.spa
dc.relation.referencesKhalidi, R. (2004). La reafirmación del Imperio: Estados Unidos y la aventura occidental en Oriente Próximo. Madrid: Los Libros de la Catarata.spa
dc.relation.referencesKrauthammer,C.(1991).The Unipolar Moment. Foreign Affairs, 70(1), 23-33eng
dc.relation.referencesLayne, C. (2006). The Unipolar Illusion Revisited: The Coming End of the United States Unipolar Moment. International Security, 31(2), 7-41.eng
dc.relation.referencesLobel, J., & Ratner, M. (1999). Bypassing the Security Council: Ambiguous Authorizations to Use Force, Cease-Fires and the Iraqi Inspection Regime. American Journal of International Law 124-154.eng
dc.relation.referencesLopez, G. A., & Cortright, D. (2004). Containing Iraq: Sanctions Worked. Foreign Affairs, 83, 90-103.eng
dc.relation.referencesMalone,D.,&Khong,Y.F.(2003). Unilateralism and US Foreign Policy: International Perspectives. Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publisherseng
dc.relation.referencesMearsheimer, J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W. Norton.eng
dc.relation.referencesMearsheimer, J., & Walt, S. (2007). El Lobby d'Israel. Badalona: Ara.eng
dc.relation.referencesMueller, J., & Mueller, K. (1999). Sanctions of Mass Destruction. Foreign Affairs, 78(3), 43-53.eng
dc.relation.referencesNye, J. (2002). The Paradox of American Power: Why the World's Only Superpower Can't Go it Alone. New York: Oxford University Press.eng
dc.relation.referencesTindal, G., & Shi, D. (1993). America: A Narrative History. New York: Norton.eng
dc.relation.referencesUNMOVIC. (2011a). Compendium, Observations and Lessons Learned. from http://www.unmovic.orgeng
dc.relation.references(2011b).United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission from http://www.unmovic.org/eng
dc.relation.referencesWalt, S. M. (2000). Two Cheers for Clinton ́s Foreign Policy. Foreign Affairs(March/April), 63-79.eng
dc.relation.references(2005). Taming American Power. Foreign Affairs, 84(5), 105-120.eng
dc.relation.referencesWaltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. London: Reading, Mass.: Addison Wesley.eng
dc.relation.references(2000). Structural Realism after the Cold War. International Security, 25(1), 5-41.eng
dc.relation.referencesWilliams, I. (2004, 4/5). Blix Not Bombs. The Nation, 278, 5-6.eng
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.unab.edu.co
dc.subject.proposalEE. UU.spa
dc.subject.proposalIrakspa
dc.subject.proposalOriente Mediospa
dc.subject.proposalUNMOVIC.spa
dc.subject.proposalUNSCOM.spa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/CJournalArticle
dc.rights.creativecommonsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia*
dc.publisher.deparmentInstituto de Estudios Políticos IEPspa


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia