Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorCuadra Montiel, Héctorspa
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-27T15:12:27Z
dc.date.available2020-10-27T15:12:27Z
dc.date.issued2015-12-15
dc.identifier.issn2590-8669|0124-0781
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/10848
dc.description.abstractUna demanda fundamental de este artículo es la necesidad de repolitizar los procesos de cambio social en México, replanteando el examen crítico de imperativos económicos y de mecanismos de aplicación autoinducidos. Centrándose en las dimensiones socio-políticas de los procesos de democratización en curso, se hace hincapié en que si estos últimos habrán de tener éxito, tenemos que estar conscientes de los efectos generales de transformación que conllevan. Por lo tanto, el reto para la construcción de una sociedad más igualitaria y democrática debe llevarse a cabo sin demora. Se sugiere que mecanismos de gobernanza horizontales podrían ser de gran ayuda en la elaboración de una agenda más democrática, lo que a su vez, puede abrir nuevas posibilidades de transformación.spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUNAB
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/reflexion/article/view/2321/1997
dc.relation.urihttps://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/reflexion/article/view/2321
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.sourceReflexión Política; Vol. 17 No. 34 (2015): Reflexión Política (julio a diciembre); 6-19
dc.subjectCiencias jurídicas y políticas
dc.subjectDerecho
dc.subjectInvestigaciones
dc.subjectLegislación
dc.titleConsideraciones sobre el cambio social en México
dc.title.translatedConsiderations on social change in Mexicoeng
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.localArtículospa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.subject.keywordsLegal and Political Scienceseng
dc.subject.keywordsLaweng
dc.subject.keywordsInvestigationseng
dc.subject.keywordsLegislationeng
dc.subject.keywordsSocial changeeng
dc.subject.keywordsDemocratizationeng
dc.subject.keywordsEquityeng
dc.subject.keywordsNetworkingeng
dc.subject.keywordsAgendaeng
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNABspa
dc.type.hasversionInfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.relation.referencesADAMS, J. A. ir. (1997). Alexican banking and investment in transition.IVestport.CT: Quorum Books.
dc.relation.referencesAGUAYO. S. (1998). Myths and (mis) perceplions: changing U.S elite visions of Alexico. Trans. Julián Brody. La Jolla: Center for US-Mexican Studies. University of California. San Diego. and Centro de Estudios Internacionales, El Colegio de México
dc.relation.referencesAGUILAR CAMÍN. 11. and MEYER. L. (1993). In the shadow of the Merican revolulion: comen:piral-y Alexican hisiory 1910-1918. Trans. Luis Alberto Fierro. Austin: University of Texas Press.
dc.relation.referencesBABB. S. (2001). Managing Mexico: economisis from nationalism so neoliberalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
dc.relation.referencesBLYTII. M. (1997). "Any more bright ideas? The ideational tum of comparative political economy". Comparativepolirics. 29(1):229-250.
dc.relation.referencesBLYTII. M. (2002). Greal iramfirmations: economic ideas and institutional change in the rwentierh century.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesCALVA. J.L. (2000). México más allá del neoliberalismo: opciones dentro del cambio global. México: Plaza y Janés.
dc.relation.referencesCAMP. R.A. (2002). Mesico's mandarina: crafling a power elite ,for the twenty:firsi censan'. Berkeley: University of Califomia Press.
dc.relation.referencesCAMP R.A. (2003). Polilla in Mexico: the demacra& tranálarmation. ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesCENTENO, M.A. (1994). Democracy within reason: terhnocratic ~l'ilion in Mexico. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.
dc.relation.referencesCHOSSUDOVSKY. M. (1998). The globalization of poverty: impacls qf IMF and lihrld Bank reforms. London: Zed Books.
dc.relation.referencesCUADRA MONTIEL. II. (2007a). "Critical realism and the strategic-relational approach: comments on a non-typical KWNS-SWPR experience". Journal of Critica, Realism. 6 (1): 87-113.
dc.relation.referencesCUADRA MONTIEL. II. ( 2007 b). "1 ncompleteness of post-Washington consensus: a critique of macroeconomic and institutional refonns". International Studies. 44(2): 103-122.
dc.relation.referencesCUADRA MONTIEL, H. (2008). “Where does Mexico stand? Interpreting NAFTA´s regional scope and the FTAAhemispheric project”, Norteamérica, 3 (5): 65-93.
dc.relation.referencesCUADRA MONTIEL, H. (2011). “Demystifying Globalization and the State: Preliminary Comments on Re-Commodification, Institutions and Innovation”. Pachura, P. (ed.) The Systemic Dimension of Globalization. Rijeka: InTech.
dc.relation.referencesCUADRA MONTIEL, H. (2012). “Globalization and Re-Commodification in Mexico”. Cuadra-Montiel, H. (ed.) Globalization – Approaches to Diversity. Rijeka: InTech.
dc.relation.referencesCUADRA MONTIEL, H. (2013a). “El Estado en la Remercantilización: Protagonista en los Procesos Globales”. Revista Enfoques: Ciencia Política y Administración Pública. XI (19): 105-137.
dc.relation.referencesCUADRA MONTIEL. II. (20136). "Consenso y Pos-consenso de Washington: Dos Generaciones de Re formas Incompletas". Revista de Relaciones Internacionales. Estrategia ySeguridad. 8 ( I 1:21-44.
dc.relation.referencesCUADRA MONTIEL. II. (20I4a). "Realismo Critico Mestizo: Una visión de México desde el Enfoque Estratégico Relacionar. Politica & Sociedade. 13 (27): 153-188.
dc.relation.referencesCUADRA MONTIEL. H. (2014b). "Reflexiones sobre el Carácter Económico del Estado". Perspectiva Global. 2(3): 77-86.
dc.relation.referencesCUADRA MONTIEL, H. (2015). "Polanyi Mestizo: Una Interpretación de los Procesos Sociales de Estado y Mercado en México" Revista Mexicana de Ciencias PoliticasvSociales. LX (224): 133-162.
dc.relation.referencesDOMINGO. P. (2000). "Judicial independence: the politics of the Supreme Court in Mexico". Journal of Latin American studies. 32: 705-735.
dc.relation.referencesDOMÍNGUEZ. J.I. and FERNÁNDEZ DE CASTRO. R. (2001). The Uniled Pares and Mexico: berreen partnershipand conffia, London: Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesDOMÍNGUEZ, J.1. and POIRÉ. A. (eds.) (1999). Toward .4Iexico's democratization: parlies. rampaigns. elecsions and publicopinion. London: Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesDUSSEL PETERS. E. (2000). Polarizing Mexico: the impaa qf liberalizarion strate1,7, London: Lynne Rienner.
dc.relation.referencesELIZONDO MAYER-SERRA, C. y NACIF HERNÁNDEZ. B. (eds.) (2002a). Lecturas sobre el cambio politico en México. México: Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas y Fondo de Cultura Económica.
dc.relation.referencesELIZONDO MAYER-SERRA, C. y NACIF HERNÁNDEZ. B. (20026). La lógica del cambio político en México. In: C. México: Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas y Fondode Cultura Económica
dc.relation.referencesGEORGE. S. and SABELLI. F. (1994). Fakir and credir: the lfórld Bank 's serularempire. London: Penguin Books.
dc.relation.referencesFISCIIER. S. (1997). "Applied economics in action: IMF programs". The American economic review, 87 (2): 23-27.
dc.relation.referencesGILPIN. R. (2000). The challenge of global capitalism: the world economy in the 21st censan', Princeton: Princeton University Press.
dc.relation.referencesGILPIN. R. (2001). Global political economy: understanding ¡he International economic arder, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
dc.relation.referencesGIUGALE. M.M.. LAFOURCADE, 0., and NGUYEN VINII, II. (eds.). (2001). Mexico: a comprehensive development agenda ,for the new era, Washington DC: The World Bank.
dc.relation.referencesGONZÁLEZ CASANOVA. P. (1970). Democracy in Mexico. Trans. Danielle Salti. New York: Oxford University Press
dc.relation.referencesHAY. C. (1998). The tangled webs rce Roan.: the discourse. straregv and practice of nerworking. In: D. Marsh. ed. Comparing policy networks. Buckingharn: Open University Press.
dc.relation.referencesHAY. C. and RICHARDs. D. (2000). "The tangled webs of Westminster and Whitehall: the discourse. strategy and practice of networking within the British core executive", Publicadministration. 78(1): 1-28.
dc.relation.referencesIIIRSCHMAN, A.O. (1970). Exit. volee and loyalty: responses lo declines in firms. organizations and mates. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
dc.relation.referencesIIIRSCHMAN, A.O. (1970). Exit. volee and loyalty: responses lo declines in firms. organizations and mates. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
dc.relation.referencesIIIRSCHMAN, A.O. (1970). Exit. volee and loyalty: responses lo declines in firms. organizations and mates. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
dc.relation.referencesIIIRSCHMAN, A.O. (1970). Exit. volee and loyalty: responses lo declines in firms. organizations and mates. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
dc.relation.referencesLEVY. D.C. and BRUIIN. K. (2001). Mexico: the struggle for demacra& development. Berkeley: University of California Press.
dc.relation.referencesLUSTIG. N. (1997). "Los Estados Unidos al rescate: la asistencia financiera a México en 1982 y 1995". Revista de la CEPAL. 61:39-61.
dc.relation.referencesLUSTIG. N. (1998). Mexico: the remaking of an economy. r ed. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
dc.relation.referencesMINUSIIKIN. S. (2001). "Bankers into brokers: the structural transformation and opening of Mexico's financial markets", Documento de Trabajo 72, Centro de Investigación vDocencia Económicas. México: CIDE.
dc.relation.referencesMINÚSIIKIN. S. (2002). "Banqueros y bolseros: structural change and financial market liberalization in Mexico". Journal of Latin American símiles. 34: 915¬944.
dc.relation.referencesMOCTEZUMA BARRAGÁN. E. and ROEMER, A. (2001). A new public management in Mexico: towards a govemment that produces results. Aldershot:Ashgate.
dc.relation.referencesPOLANYI. K. (1957/1944). The great transIbrmation: the militical and economic origins (latir time. Boston: Beacon Press.
dc.relation.referencesROSAS. M.C. (1999). México yla politica comercial externa de las rondes potencias. México: Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas. Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Social.UNAM. y Miguel Ángel P011113.
dc.relation.referencesSCHUMPETER. J.A. (1951/1934). The theory of economic development: an impío: into projits. capital, credit. interest. and the business cyrle. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
dc.relation.referencesSERRANO. M. (ed.). (1998). Governing Mexico: political parties and elections, London: ILAS, University of London.
dc.relation.referencesSTIGLITZ, J.E. (1998). "Towards a new paradigm for development: strategies. policies and proctssts". The 1998 Prebisch Lecture at UNCTAD. Geneva: World Bank. October 1998.
dc.relation.referencesURZÚA. C.M. (2000). "Medio siglo de relaciones entre el Banco Mundial y Mexico: una reseña desde el trópico". México: El Colegio de México.
dc.relation.referencesVREELAND, J.R. (2003). The LIIF and economic development, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesWALT. S.M. (1995). The origins of alliances, London: Comell University Press.
dc.relation.referencesWARD. P.M. and RODRÍGUEZ. V.E. (1999). "New federalista. infra-governmental relations and co¬govemance in Mexico". Journal of Latín American studies. 31:673-710.
dc.relation.referencesWATSON. M. (2000). The political disrourse of globalization: globalising tendencias as self-induced externa! enforcement mechanisms. PhD thesis. POLSIS. School of Social Sciences. The University of Birmingham.
dc.relation.referencesWATSON, M. (2003). Constructing and conresting orthodoxies: general equilibrium economics and the political discourse of globalization. Paper presented to the Annual Conference of the International Studies Association. Portland. Oregon. February 2003. Portland. Oregon.
dc.relation.referencesWHITEHEAD. L. (2002). Denrocratization: theoryandexperience.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesWILLIAMS. H.L. (2001). Social movements and economic transition: markers and distributive con/lid in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesWILLIAMS. H.L. (2001). Social movements and economic transition: markers and distributive con/lid in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.contributor.orcidCuadra Montiel, Héctor [0000-0001-6405-7530]spa
dc.subject.lembCiencias jurídicas y políticasspa
dc.subject.lembDerechospa
dc.subject.lembInvestigaciónspa
dc.subject.lembLegislaciónspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.unab.edu.co
dc.description.abstractenglishA key claim of this article is the need for re-politicizing the processes of social change in Mexico, while critically examining economic imperatives as self-induced enforcement mechanisms. Focusing on the socio-political dimensions of the process, I undertake an analysis of the features of the democratization processes currently under way. It is emphasized that if the latter are to succeed, we need to be aware of the broad transformative effects which they entail. Therefore, the challenge for a more egalitarian and democratic society must be undertaken without delay. It is suggested that network governance could be of great help in drawing up a more democratic agenda, which may open up further possibilities of transformation.eng
dc.subject.proposalCambio socialspa
dc.subject.proposalDemocratizaciónspa
dc.subject.proposalEquidadspa
dc.subject.proposalRedes socialesspa
dc.subject.proposalAgendaspa
dc.identifier.doi10.29375/01240781.2321
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/CJournalArticle
dc.publisher.deparmentInstituto de Estudios Políticos IEPspa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/