Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGil, Juan Manuelspa
dc.contributor.authorAguilera, Andrésspa
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-27T15:12:19Z
dc.date.available2020-10-27T15:12:19Z
dc.date.issued2017-06-30
dc.identifier.issn2590-8669|0124-0781
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/10809
dc.description.abstractEste artículo evalúa críticamente el rol de las instituciones internacionales, bajo la visión de los neo-gramscianos y los institucionalistas liberales. Los neo-gramscianos argumentan que el propósito de las instituciones internacionales es mantener el poder hegemónico. Y para lograr este propósito, el sistema capitalista se ha extendido a través de las políticas de libre comercio de la OMC y condicionesen los préstamos del FMI y del Banco Mundial. Por su parte, los institucionalistasliberales sostienen que las instituciones internacionales han permitido la cooperación y facilitado la consecución de objetivos comunes, disminuyendo lainfluencia del poder hegemónico.spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUNAB
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/reflexion/article/view/2747/2321
dc.relation.urihttps://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/reflexion/article/view/2747
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.sourceReflexión Política; Vol. 19 No. 37 (2017): Reflexión Política (enero a junio); 6-15
dc.subjectNeo-gramscianos
dc.subjectInstitucionalistas liberales
dc.subjectInstituciones Internacionales
dc.subjectOMC
dc.subjectFMI
dc.subjectBanco Mundial
dc.titleInstituciones internacionales: Para bien o para malspa
dc.title.translatedInternational Institutions: For better or worsteng
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.localArtículospa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.subject.keywordsNeo-Gramscianseng
dc.subject.keywordsLiberal institutionalistseng
dc.subject.keywordsInternational institutionseng
dc.subject.keywordsWTOeng
dc.subject.keywordsIMFeng
dc.subject.keywordsWorld Bankeng
dc.subject.keywordsLegal and political scienceseng
dc.subject.keywordsRighteng
dc.subject.keywordsResearcheng
dc.subject.keywordsLegislationeng
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNABspa
dc.type.hasversionInfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.relation.referencesBates, T. R. (1975). Gramsci and the Theory of Hegemony. Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. 36, No. 2. University of Pennsylvania Press. pp. 353.
dc.relation.referencesBhagwati, J. & Srinivasan, T. N. (2002). Trade and Poverty in the Poor Countries. The American Economic Review, Vol. 92, No. 2, Papers and Proceedings of the One Hundred Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association (May, 2002), American Economic Association. pp. 182.
dc.relation.referencesBieler, A. & Morton, A. D. (2004). A critical theory route to hegemony, world order and historical change: neo-Gramscian perspectives in International Relations. Capital & Class. SAGE. pp 103.
dc.relation.referencesCarroll, W. K. (2006). Hegemony, Counterhegemony, Anti-hegemony. Socialist Studies / Études socialistes, Vol 2, No 2. Pp. 27.
dc.relation.referencesChan, S. (1985). The Impact of Defense Spending on Economic Performance: A Survey of Evidence and Problems. Orbis 29(2). Pp. 403-434.
dc.relation.referencesCairns, E. (1997). A safer future: Reducing the Human Cost of War. Oxford U.K. Oxfam Publications. Quoted in Collier, Paul (2003). Breaking the conflict trap: civil war and development policy. World Bank and Oxford University Press. Pp. 14.
dc.relation.referencesCalomiris, C. W. (2000). When Will Economics Guide IMF and World Bank Reforms? Cato Journal, Vol. 20, No. 1. Cato Institute. Pp. 88.
dc.relation.referencesCollier, P. (1999). On the economic consequences of civil war. Oxford Economics papers 51. Oxford University Press. Pp. 168-169.
dc.relation.referencesCollier, P. (2003). Breaking the conflict trap: civil war and development policy. World Bank and Oxford University Press. Pp. 13.
dc.relation.referencesCox, R. (1981). Social Forces, States, and World Orders: Beyond International Relations. Theory+Millennium 10 ~2!:126–55
dc.relation.referencesCox, R. (1983). Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: An Essay in Method. Journal of International Studies. Millennium. pp.162 - 175.
dc.relation.referencesCox, R. (1992). Multilateralism and World Order. Review of International Studies, Vol. 18, No. 2. Cambridge University Press. pp. 173.
dc.relation.referencesCox, R. (1999). Civil Society at the Turn of the Millenium: Prospects for an Alternative World Order. Review of International Studies, Vol. 25, No. 1. Cambridge University Press. pp. 3-28.
dc.relation.referencesDieter, H. (2000). Monetary Regionalism: Regional Integration without financial crisis. Institute for Development and Peace. Duisburg University. pp 2.
dc.relation.referencesDinan, D. (2005). Ever Closer Union: An Introduction to European Integration. Lynne Rienner Publishers Third edition. pp. 3.
dc.relation.referencesDollar, D. (2001). Globalization, Inequality and Poverty Since 1980. Background paper, World Bank, Washington, DC pp. 17.
dc.relation.referencesDreher, A. (2002). The development and implementation of IMF and World Bank conditionality. Hamburg: HWWA Discussion Paper 165.
dc.relation.referencesEhrenberg, J. (1999). Civil society: the critical history of an idea. New York University Press. pp 209.
dc.relation.referencesElster, J. (1986). An introduction to Karl Marx. Cambridge University Press. pp. 161.
dc.relation.referencesEngel, S. (2006). Where to Neoliberalism? The 13 4 More information can be found on http://ndb.int/about-us.php 5 More information can be found on http://euweb.aiib.org/html/aboutus/introduction/aiib/?show=0 World Bank and the Post-Washington, Consensus in Indonesia and Vietnam. 16th Biennial Conference of the Asian Studies Association of Australia in Wollongong 26 June - 29 June 2006. pp. 4.
dc.relation.referencesGill, S. (1986). Hegemony, Consensus and Trilateralism. Review of International Studies, Vol. 12, No. 3. Cambridge University Press. Pp. 205-222.
dc.relation.referencesGramsci A. (1971), Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Translated & Edited by Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith. International Publishers, New York. Pp. 1- 572
dc.relation.referencesGlobal Governance Group (2001). Global Governance: Report to the Bishops of COMECE. A Report to the Bishops of COMECE. Retrieved April, 2016, from http:/info.wordbank.org/etools/docs/libra ry/57440/camdessus.pdf
dc.relation.referencesGould, E.R. (2001). The changing activities of international organizations: The case of the international monetary fund. Paper presented at the APSA 2001 conference. Unpublished manuscript. Pp. 6.
dc.relation.referencesGrieco, J. M. (1988). Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism. International Organization Vol. 42, No. 3. The MIT Press. Pp. 487.
dc.relation.referencesHarvey, D. (2007). Neo-liberalism as creative destruction. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science vol. 610 no. 1. Pp. 123.
dc.relation.referencesHibou, B. (2000). The Political Economy of the World Bank's Discourse: from Economic Catechism to Missionary Deeds and Misdeeds. Paris. Etudes du CERI, 39. Translate from French by Janet Roitman. CNRS, Paris. Pp. 3.
dc.relation.referencesHunt, A. (1990). Rights and Social Movements: Counter-Hegemonic Strategies. Journal of Law and Society, Vol. 17, No. 3 (Autumn, 1990). Blackwell Publishing pp. 309-328.
dc.relation.referencesInternational Monetary Fund (IMF) (2010). IMF Conditionality. Retrieved April, 2016, from http://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/ facts/conditio.htm
dc.relation.referencesIrwin, D. A. (2009). Free trade under fire. Princeton University Press. 3rd ed. pp. 44.
dc.relation.referencesKahler, M. (1995). International institutions and the political economy of integration. The brookings Institution. pp. Preface.
dc.relation.referencesKeohane, R. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ. Princeton University Press. pp. 243 – 250.
dc.relation.referencesKeohane, R.. & Grant, R. W. (2005). Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics. The American Political Science Review, Vol. 99, No. 1. American Political Science Association. pp. 33.
dc.relation.referencesKrasner, S. (1991). Global Communications and National Power: Life on the Pareto Frontier. World Politics, Vol. 43, 3 pp. 336-366.
dc.relation.referencesKumar, K. (1993). Civil Society: An Inquiry into the Usefulness of an Historical Term. The British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 44, No. 3. Blackwell Publishing. pp. 382.
dc.relation.referencesLeech, D. (2002). Voting power in the governance of the International Monetary Fund. Annals of Operations Research. Vol 109, 1, Pp. 375-397.
dc.relation.referencesMayne, R. (2002). The global NGO campaign on patents and access to medicines: An Oxfam perspective. in Peter Drahos and Ruth Mayne, editors, Global Intellectual Property Rights: Knowledge Access and Development. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, Pp. 244–258.
dc.relation.referencesMarx, K. (1978). The Marx-Engels Reader. Ed. Robert C. Tucker. New York: W.W. Norton & Company. Pp. 70- 86.
dc.relation.referencesMilner, H. V. (1998). International Political Economy: Beyond Hegemonic Stability. Foreign Policy, No. 110. Washingtonpost. Newsweek Interactive, LLC. Pp 116.
dc.relation.referencesN u r u z z a m a n , M . ( 2 0 0 8 ) . L i b e r a l Institutionalism and International Cooperation after 11 September 2001. International Studies 45. Pp. 195.
dc.relation.referencesPowell, R. (1994). Anarchy in International Relations Theory: The NeorealistNeoliberal Debate. International Organization, Vol. 48, No. 2. The MIT Press. Pp. 330.
dc.relation.referencesPuchala, D. J. (2005). World Hegemony and the United Nations. International Studies Review, 7 Pp. 571-584.
dc.relation.referencesRicardo, D. (1817). Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. In London: John Murray , published in 1821.
dc.relation.referencesRodrik D. (1994). The rush to free trade in the developing world. Why so late? Why now? Will it last? In Voting for Reform: Democracy, Political Liberalization, and Economic Adjustment, ed. S Haggard, S Webb, New York. Oxford Univ. Press pp. 62.
dc.relation.referencesRoger, S. (1991). Gramsci's Political Thought: An Introduction. Lawrence & Wishart Ltd, London, pp. 24 – 26.
dc.relation.referencesRupert, M. (2010). Marxism and critical theory. in Dunne, Tim. Kurki, Milja and Smith 14 Juan Manuel Gil, Andrés Aguilera / Instituciones Internacionales: Para bien o para mal Steve, International Relations Theories, Discipline and diversity, Second Edition, Oxford University Press. Pp. 161.
dc.relation.referencesSmith, A. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. In London: Routledge; New York: E. P. Dutton.
dc.relation.referencesSterling-Folker, J.r (2010). Neoliberalism. In Tim Dunne, Milja Kurki & Steve Smith. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Oxford University nd Press. 2 Ed. Pp.117-134.
dc.relation.referencesTabb, W. K. (2004) Economic governance in the age of globalization. Columbia University Press. Pp. 1-510.
dc.relation.referencesWalt, S. M. (1998) One World, Many Theories. Foreign Policy, No. 110, Special Edition: Frontiers of Knowledge. Washington post. Newsweek Interactive, LLC. Pp. 29-46.
dc.relation.referencesWoods, N. (2006) The globalizers: the IMF, the World Bank, and their borrowers. Cornell University Press. Pp. 15.
dc.relation.referencesWorld Bank (2016). About Us. Retrieved April, 2 0 1 6 , f r o m , f r o m http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTE RNAL/EXTABOUTUS/0,,contentMDK:206 53660~menuPK:72312~pagePK:511236 44~piPK:329829~theSitePK:29708,00.h tml
dc.relation.referencesWorld Economic Forum (2010). Global Redesign: Strengthening International Cooperationin a More Interdependent World. Edited by Richard Samans, Klaus Schwab and Mark Malloch-Brown. pp 1- 452.
dc.relation.referencesWorld Social Forum (WSF) (2016). What the World Social Forum is Retrieved April, 2 0 1 6 , f r o m , f r o m http://www.forumsocialmundial.org.br/m ain.php?id_menu=19&cd_language=2
dc.relation.referencesWorld Trade Organization (WTO) (2016). What is the WTO? Retrieved April, 2016, from http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/what is_e/whatis_e.htm/
dc.subject.lembCiencias jurídicas y políticasspa
dc.subject.lembDerechospa
dc.subject.lembInvestigacionesspa
dc.subject.lembLegislaciónspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.unab.edu.co
dc.description.abstractenglishThis article critically assess the role of international institutions according to the neo-Gramscians ' and Liberal Institutionalists ' view. Neo-Gramscians argue that the real aim of these institutions is to maintain the hegemony. By doing so, the capitalist system has been spread in the world system through free trade policies driven by the WTO and through conditional loans given by the IMF and the World Bank. Liberal Institutionalists argue that international institutions have make cooperation possible and have facilitated the path to achieve common objectives reducing the influence that the hegemon has exerted over them.eng
dc.subject.proposalNeo-gramscianosspa
dc.subject.proposalInstitucionalistas liberalsspa
dc.subject.proposalInstituciones internacionalesspa
dc.subject.proposalOMCspa
dc.subject.proposalFMIspa
dc.subject.proposalBanco Mundialspa
dc.identifier.doi10.29375/01240781.2747
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/CJournalArticle
dc.rights.creativecommonsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia*
dc.publisher.deparmentInstituto de Estudios Políticos IEPspa


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia