Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNoriega Rangel, Javierspa
dc.contributor.authorEscobar, Pedro Fspa
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-27T14:21:45Z
dc.date.available2020-10-27T14:21:45Z
dc.date.issued2005-08-03
dc.identifier.issn2382-4603
dc.identifier.issn0123-7047
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/10434
dc.description.abstractDesde la década pasada la cirugía mínimamente invasiva ha llegado a ser parte de casi todos los campos quirúrgicos. El ginecólogo estuvo entre los primeros en reconocer el potencial del abordaje laparoscopico para el manejo de varios problemas ginecológicos benignos. La laparoscopia ofrece varias ventajas sobre la laparotomía. La anatomía pélvica y abdominal aparece magnificada permitiendo un diagnostico y manejo preciso de la enfermedad adyacente a órganos vitales, vasos sanguíneos y estructuras neurales. Beneficios adicionales de la laparoscopia incluyen sangrado mínimo de los pequeños vasos ayudado por el pneumoperitoneo, eliminación de grandes incisiones, menos formación de adherencias, de ambulacion temprana y rápida recuperación, corta estancia hospitalaria y menos costos para el paciente y hospital. Aunque el examen clínico y los resultados del estudio prequirúrgico frecuentemente indican la naturaleza benigna o maligna de de las masas anexiales, solo la histología puede proveer el diagnostico absoluto. Cuando un tumor maligno es detectado de inmediato se debe realizar una clasificación del estadio por laparoscopia o laparotomía. La laparoscopia operatoria para evaluación y manejo de masas anexiales cuando es practicada por un cirujano entrenado en cirugía laparoscopica avanzada es segura ,efectiva y asociada con menos morbilidad comparada con las técnicas abiertas.spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNAB
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/medunab/article/view/201/184
dc.relation.urihttps://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/medunab/article/view/201
dc.sourceMedUNAB; Vol. 8 Núm. 2 (2005): Especial Salud de la Mujer; 151-158
dc.subjectCiencias de la salud
dc.subjectMedicina
dc.subjectCiencias médicas
dc.subjectInnovaciones en salud
dc.subjectInvestigaciones
dc.titleConsideraciones anatómicas y quirúrgicas de la cirugía mínimamente invasiva de las masas anexiales
dc.title.translatedAnatomical and surgical considerations for minimally invasive surgery of adnexal mass lesionseng
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad Ciencias de la Salud
dc.publisher.programPregrado Medicina
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.localArtículospa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.subject.keywordsHealth Scienceseng
dc.subject.keywordsMedicineeng
dc.subject.keywordsMedical Scienceseng
dc.subject.keywordsBiomedical Scienceseng
dc.subject.keywordsLife Scienceseng
dc.subject.keywordsInnovations in healtheng
dc.subject.keywordsResearcheng
dc.subject.keywordsLaparoscopy
dc.subject.keywordsUltrasonography
dc.subject.keywordsAdnexal mass
dc.subject.keywordsDoppler
dc.subject.keywordsCA-125
dc.subject.keywordsOvarian cancer
dc.subject.keywordsTransvaginal ultrasound
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNABspa
dc.type.hasversionInfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.relation.referencesermesh M, Silva PD, Rosen GF, Stein AL, Fossum GT, Sauer MV. Management of unruptured ectopic gestation by linear salpingostomy: a prospective, randomized clinical trial of lapa-roscopy versus laparotomy. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 73:400-4
dc.relation.referencesMurphy AA, Nager CW, WujekJJ, Kettel LM, Torp VA, Chin HG. Operative laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of ectopic pregnancy: a prospective trial. Fertil Steril 1992; 57:1180-5
dc.relation.referencesMalur S, Possover M, Michels W, Schneider A. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal versus abdominal surgery in patients with endometrial cancer--a prospective randomized trial. Gynecol Oncol 2001; 80:239-44
dc.relation.referencesTheodoridis TD, Bontis. Laparoscopy and oncology: where do we stand today? Ann N Y Acad Sci 2003; 997:282-91
dc.relation.referencesNezhat CH, Nezhat F, Brill A, Nezhat C. Normal variation of abdominal and pelvic anatomy evaluated at laparoscopy. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 94:238-42
dc.relation.referencesZahi H, Penketh R, Newton J. Gynecological laparoscopy audit: Birmingham experience. Gynecol Endocrinol 1995; 4:251-7
dc.relation.referencesAharoni A, Condea A, Leitbovitz Z. A comparative study of Foley catheter and suturing to control trocar-induced abdominal wall heamorrhage. Gynecol Endocrinol 1997; 6:31-
dc.relation.referencesVasquez JM. Vascular complications of laparoscopic surgery. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1994; 1:163-7
dc.relation.referencesSpitzer M, Golden P, Rehwaldt L, Benjamin F. Repair of laparos-copic injury to abdominal wall arteries complicated by cutaneous necrosis. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1996; 3:449-52
dc.relation.referencesHurd WW, Bude RO, DeLancey JO, Newman JS. The location of abdominal wall blood vessels in relationship to abdominal landmarks apparent at laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171:642-6
dc.relation.referencesQuint EH, Wang FL, Hurd WW. Laparoscopic translumination for the location of anterior abdominal wall blood vessels. J La-paroendosc Surg 1996; 6:167-9
dc.relation.referencesSaber AA, Meslemani AM, Davis R, Pimentel R. Safety zones for anterior abdominal wall entry during laparoscopy: a CT scan mapping of epigastric vessels. Ann Surg 2004; 239:182-5
dc.relation.referencesWhiteside JL, Barber MD, Walters MD, Falcone T. Anatomy of ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves in relation to trocars placement and low transverse incisions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189:1574-8; discussion 1578
dc.relation.referencesMirhashemi R, Harlow BL, Ginsburg ES, Signorello LB, Ber-kowitz R, Feldman S. Predicting risk of complications with gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 92:327-31
dc.relation.referencesCardosi RJ, Cox CS, Hoffman MS. Postoperative neuropathies after major pelvic surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100:240-4
dc.relation.referencesLeonard F, Lecuru F, Rizk E, Chasset S, Robin F, Taurelle R. Perioperative morbidity of gynecological laparoscopy. A pros-pective monocenter observational study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000; 79:129-34
dc.relation.referencesHurd WW, Bude RO. The location of abdominal wall vessels in relationship to abdominal landmarks apparent at laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171:624-6
dc.relation.referencesRoman LD, Felix JC, Muderspach LI, Agahjanian A, Qian D, Morrow CP. Pelvic examination, tumor marker, grey scale and doppler sonography in prediction of pelvic. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89:493-500
dc.relation.referencesParker WH, Berek JS. Laparoscopic management of adnexal masses. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 1994; 21:79-92
dc.relation.referencesNezhat F, Nezhat CH, Welander CE. Four ovarian cancer diag-nosed during laparoscopic management of 10111 women with adnexal masses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 167:790-6
dc.relation.referencesHulka JK, Parker WH, Surrey MW. America association of Gynecologic laparoscopist survey of management of adnexal masses in 1990. J Reprod Med 1992; 37:599-602
dc.relation.referencesBarber HR, Graber EA. The postmenopausal palpable ovary syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 1971; 38:921
dc.relation.referencesPadilla LA, Radosevich DM, Milad MP. Accuracy of the pelvic exam in detecting adnexal masses. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 96A:593-8
dc.relation.referencesBrown DL, Doubilet PM, Miller FH, Frates MC, Laing FC, Di Salvo DN, et al. Benign and malignant ovarian masses: selection of the most discriminating gray-scale and Doppler sonographic features. Radiology 1998; 208:103-10
dc.relation.referencesHermmann UJ, Locher GW, Goldhirsh A. Sonographic patterns of ovarian tumors: prediction of malignancy. Obstet Gynecol 1987;69:777-81
dc.relation.referencesFunt SA, Hann LE. Detection and characterization of adnexal mass. Radiol Clin N Am 2002; 40:591-608
dc.relation.referencesGuerreiro S, Ajossa S, Risalvato A, Risalvato A, Lai MP, Melis GB. Diagnosis of adnexal malignancies by using color doppler energy imaging as a secondary test in persistent masse. Ultra-sound Obstet Gynecol 1998; 11:277-82
dc.relation.referencesChristiansen C, Puscheck E. Adnexal masses. Postgr Obstet Gynecol 2002; 22:1- 8
dc.relation.referencesLaing F, Brown D, Disalvo D. Update on ultrasonography: gy-necologic ultrasound. Radiol Clin N Am 2001; 39:523-40
dc.relation.referencesMol BW, Bol D, De Kanter M, Heintz AP, Sijmons EA, Oei SG, etal. Distinguishing the benign and malignant adnexal mass: An external validation of prognosis models. Gynecol Oncol 2001; 80:162-7
dc.relation.referencesValentin L, Saldkevicius P, Marsal K. Limited contribution of doppler velocimetry to the differential diagnosis of extrauterine pelvic tumors. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 83:425-33
dc.relation.referencesDePriest PD, Varner E, Powell J, Fried A, Puls L, Higgins R, et al. The efficacy of a sonographic morphology index in identifying ovarian cancer: a multiinstitutional investigation. Gynecol Oncol 1994; 55:174Ц8
dc.relation.referencesTimmerman D, Schwarzler P, Collins WP, Claerhout F, Coenen M, Amart F, et al. Subjective assessment of adnexal masses with the use of ultrasonography: an analysis of interobserver variability and experience. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999; 13:8Ц10.
dc.relation.referencesSchelling M, Braun M, Kuhn W, Bogner G, Gruber R, Gnirs J,et al. Combined transvaginal B-mode and color Doppler so-nography for differential diagnosis of ovarian tumors: results of multivariate logistic regression analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2000; 77:78-86
dc.relation.referencesZannetta G, Ferrazi E, Dordoni D, et al. Sonographic diagnosis of small adnexal masses: a multi-institutional study. Obstet Gynecol Comm 1999; 5:16-22
dc.relation.referencesWeinreb JC, Barkoff ND, Megibow A, Demopoulos R. The value of MRI in distinguishing leiomyomas from other solid pelvic masses when sonography is indeterminate. Am J Roentgenol 1990; 154:295-9
dc.relation.referencesVasilev S, Schlaerth J, Campeau J, Morrow P. Serum Ca-125 levels in preoperative evaluation of pelvic masses. Obstet Gy-encol 1988; 71:751-6
dc.relation.referencesSoderstrom RM. Operative laparoscopy. The Master’s tech-niques in gynecologic surgery. Philadelphia, New York, 2 ed, 1998
dc.relation.referencesHavrilesky LJ, Peterson BL, Dryden DK, Soper JT, Clarke-Pearson DL, Berchuck A. Predictors of clinical outcomes in the laparoscopic management of adnexal masses. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102:243-51
dc.subject.lembCiencias biomédicas
dc.subject.lembCiencias de la vida
dc.subject.lembInnovaciones en salud
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
dc.description.abstractenglishDuring the past decade, minimally invasive surgery has become a part of almost every surgical field. The gynecologic surgeons were among the first to recognize the potentials of laparoscopic appro-ach for management of various benign gynecologic problems. The laparoscopic approach offers several advantages over laparotomy. Pelvic and abdominal anatomy appears magnified, allowing precise diagnosis and treatment of the disease adjacent to vital organs, blood vessels, and nerve structures. Additional benefits of laparoscopic approach include minimized bleeding from small vessels afforded by pneumoperitoneum, the elimination of large abdominal incision, less adhesion formation, early ambulation and faster recovery, shorter hospital stay, and less cost to the patient and hospital. Although clinical examination and the results of preoperative work-up often indicate the benign or malignant nature of the adnexal mass, only histology can provide the absolute diagnosis. When malignancy is detected, immediate surgical staging by laparoscopy or by la-parotomy is indicated. Operative laparoscopy for evaluation and management of adnexal masses, when performed by a surgeon trained in advanced laparoscopic techniques, is safe and effective and associated with less morbidity compared with open techniques. [Noriega J, Escobar PF. Anatomical and surgical considerations for minimally invasive surgery of adnexal mass lesions. MedUNABeng
dc.subject.proposalLaparoscopia
dc.subject.proposalUltrasonografía
dc.subject.proposalMasa anexial
dc.subject.proposalDoppler
dc.subject.proposalCáncer ovárico
dc.subject.proposalUltrasonografía transvagina
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/CJournalArticle


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record